Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer/main/.claude/commands/gsd/check-todos.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/check-todos)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/check-todos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/check-todos/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/check-todos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/geoloeg-ist/agents-reverse-engineer/check-todos.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01556 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00778 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
gsd:check-todos scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- gsd:check-todos — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 229 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Enables reviewing captured ideas and deciding what to work on next.
If count is 0:
No pending todos.
Todos are captured during work sessions with /gsd:add-todo.
---
Would you like to:
1. Continue with current phase (/gsd:progress)
2. Add a todo now (/gsd:add-todo)
Exit.
Apply area filter if specified. Display as numbered list:
Pending Todos:
1. Add auth token refresh (api, 2d ago)
2. Fix modal z-index issue (ui, 1d ago)
3. Refactor database connection pool (database, 5h ago)
---
Reply with a number to view details, or:
- `/gsd:check-todos [area]` to filter by area
- `q` to exit
Format age as relative time.
If valid: load selected todo, proceed.
If invalid: "Invalid selection. Reply with a number (1-[N]) or q to exit."
## [title]
**Area:** [area]
**Created:** [date] ([relative time] ago)
**Files:** [list or "None"]
### Problem
[problem section content]
### Solution
[solution section content]
If files field has entries, read and briefly summarize each.
If roadmap exists:
- Check if todo's area matches an upcoming phase
- Check if todo's files overlap with a phase's scope
- Note any match for action options
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Action"
- question: "This todo relates to Phase [N]: [name]. What would you like to do?"
- options:
- "Work on it now" — move to done, start working
- "Add to phase plan" — include when planning Phase [N]
- "Brainstorm approach" — think through before deciding
- "Put it back" — return to list
If no roadmap match:
Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Action"
- question: "What would you like to do with this todo?"
- options:
- "Work on it now" — move to done, start working
- "Create a phase" — /gsd:add-phase with this scope
- "Brainstorm approach" — think through before deciding
- "Put it back" — return to list
Add to phase plan: Note todo reference in phase planning notes. Keep in pending. Return to list or exit.
Create a phase:
Display: /gsd:add-phase [description from todo]
Keep in pending. User runs command in fresh context.
Brainstorm approach: Keep in pending. Start discussion about problem and approaches.
Put it back: Return to list_todos step.
ls .planning/todos/pending/*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l
Update STATE.md "### Pending Todos" section if exists.
Check planning config:
COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"commit_docs"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "true")
git check-ignore -q .planning 2>/dev/null && COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 229 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5e450def8e2d
gsd:check-todos is a command published in the GitHub repository GeoloeG-IsT/agents-reverse-engineer (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,556 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
hatch3r-quick-change
Lightweight workflow for small changes not tracked on the board: adaptive ceremony, inline or sub-agent implementation, batch support.
hatch3r-handoff
Prepare, resume, list, complete, and prune cross-session handoff documents.
todo-add.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
todo.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
coach
Coaching analysis command. Performs data-driven work-pattern analysis and offers personal improvement suggestions.
content-close
Content session close command. Summarizes the day's output, prepares for tomorrow, and notes learnings.