Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-embargos)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-embargos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-embargos/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-embargos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-embargos.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.02467 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00493 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-embargos scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 282 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Orquestrador: Pipeline de Embargos de Declaração
<contratos_dados>
| Etapa | Entrada | Saída | Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Análise | processo.txt + decisão embargada + embargos | [NUM]-embargos-analise.md | analista-embargos |
| 2. Decisão | análise + processo + resultado | [NUM]-embargos-minuta.md | embargos-decisao |
| </contratos_dados> |
1. Determinar $WORKSPACE:
- Se $ARGUMENTS é pasta → $WORKSPACE = $ARGUMENTS
- Se $ARGUMENTS é arquivo → $WORKSPACE = pasta pai
2. Extrair $NUMERO do nome da pasta:
- Padrão: `NNNNNNN-NN.AAAA.J.RR.OOOO`
- Exemplo: `0807674-42.2015.4.05.8100`
3. Localizar arquivo TXT do processo:
- Prioridade 1: `$WORKSPACE/$NUMERO.txt`
- Prioridade 2: `$WORKSPACE/$NUMERO_consolidado.txt`
- Prioridade 3: `$WORKSPACE/processo.txt`
- Último recurso: qualquer `.txt` na pasta
4. Validar que arquivo existe e não está vazio.
Registrar variáveis:
```
$WORKSPACE = [caminho da pasta]
$NUMERO = [número do processo]
$ARQUIVO_TXT = [caminho do arquivo TXT]
```
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 282 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 227b307b4d08
pipeline-embargos is a command published in the GitHub repository georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,467 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.