pipeline-revisao-minuta

pipeline-revisao-minuta is a command for Claude Code from georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev. It costs 33 tokens per session (7,540 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A document-review pipeline that runs five reviewers in parallel, combines their reports, and checks citations in two passes. A pipeline is a sequence of automated work steps.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a draft, resume reviews that already passed validation, consolidate reviewer findings, and verify the final document before delivery.
Why use it?
It reduces repeated review work and uses script-based checks to catch missing required sections and citation problems.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; names the TodoWrite tool.

Part of the superjurista-dev plugin — 11 skills, 22 commands, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review a draft, resume reviews that already passed validation, consolidate reviewer findings, and verify the final document before delivery.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install superjurista-dev, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 11 skills, 22 commands, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pipeline-revisao-minuta

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pipeline-revisao-minuta

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/pipeline-revisao-minuta.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 7,540 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.07540
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.03770
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.01508
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00754

Measured 11d ago against content hash 6106b88d58d2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pipeline-revisao-minuta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

scaffold/commands/pipeline-revisao-minuta.md · 334 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 334 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orquestrador: Pipeline de Revisão de Minuta v3.0

v3.0 — retomada + gate por script + citações em duas passadas (molde vivo: .claude/commands/pipeline-sentenca.md). O que mudou da v2: (1) FRONTMATTER consertado — o YAML agora é a PRIMEIRA linha do arquivo (na v2 vinha DEPOIS de um H1, defeito conhecido); (2) RETOMADA — revisão cujo relatório já existe e passa no gate não roda de novo (5 revisores opus — retrabalho é o desperdício mais caro); (3) validação DETERMINÍSTICA — scripts/verificar_revisao.py confere as âncoras (normalizadas de acento/caixa); o orquestrador NÃO lê relatórios para validar; (4) CITAÇÕES EM DUAS PASSADAS — scripts/verificar_citacoes.py roda ANTES dos revisores (1ª passada, informativa: os [ERRO] alimentam o verificador-fontes) e DE NOVO sobre a robustecida (2ª passada, FATAL, com --ignorar-apos "log de alterações", porque o Log de Alterações AUTO-CITA trechos da minuta — 26 falsos positivos num documento real, calibração de 11/07/2026); (5) a âncora de fim da remessa foi alinhada ao sinalizador REAL do agente ("Verificação de remessa necessária concluída." — a tabela v2 impunha frase mais curta; o gate aceita as duas); (6) subagente responde UMA LINHA de status — o relatório vive no arquivo, nunca na conversa.

<scripts_deterministicos> | Script | Função | |--------|--------| | scripts/verificar_revisao.py | Gate + retomada: varredura (PENDENTES), --etapa (exit-coded), --etapas (subconjunto), --gate (final) | | scripts/verificar_citacoes.py | Gate de citações verbatim: 1ª passada sobre $MINUTA (informativa) e 2ª passada sobre a robustecida (fatal, com --ignorar-apos "log de alterações") | </scripts_deterministicos>

<agents_utilizados> | Agent | Capacidade | Arquivo | |-------|------------|---------| | analista-embargabilidade | Vícios embargáveis (omissão, contradição, obscuridade, erro material) | .claude/agents/revisao/analista-embargabilidade.md | | verificador-calculos | Critérios de cálculo (correção, juros, marcos, EC 113/2021) | .claude/agents/revisao/verificador-calculos.md | | verificador-fontes | Pertinência/vigência de citações (autenticidade é do script) | .claude/agents/revisao/verificador-fontes.md | | verificador-honorarios | Honorários advocatícios (CPC/2015, leis especiais, temas) | .claude/agents/revisao/verificador-honorarios.md | | verificador-remessa | Remessa necessária (cabimento, dispensa, regimes especiais) | .claude/agents/revisao/verificador-remessa.md | | redator-minuta-robustecida | Consolida revisões em minuta robustecida com log | .claude/agents/redacao/redator-minuta-robustecida.md | </agents_utilizados>

Read the full file on GitHub · 334 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 334 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 6106b88d58d2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pipeline-revisao-minuta is a command published in the GitHub repository georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 7,540 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.