Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin/axonflow-revoke-override)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin/axonflow-revoke-override"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin/axonflow-revoke-override/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin/axonflow-revoke-override"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin/axonflow-revoke-override.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00180 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00090 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
axonflow-revoke-override scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Revoke an active AxonFlow session override using the delete_override MCP tool.
Override ID to revoke: $ARGUMENTS
If no override ID was provided, suggest the user run /axonflow-list-overrides first to find the override they want to revoke.
After revocation:
- The next policy evaluation will not consult the revoked override
- The platform records an
override_revokedaudit event for compliance - A 404 from the platform means the override was already revoked or never existed; surface this as "override not found or already revoked" rather than a hard error
Confirm to the user: "Override <id> revoked. The previously-blocked tool will now require a fresh override or a policy change before it succeeds."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 19 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 99b4722a164f
axonflow-revoke-override is a command published in the GitHub repository getaxonflow/axonflow-claude-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 180 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ai-act-incidents
Show real-world and research-demonstrated security incidents that map to a scanner dimension, EU AI Act article, or threat category. Surfaces OWASP LLM/ASI, NIST AI RMF, and MITRE ATLAS cross-references alongside published mitigations.
ai-act-scan
Scan a codebase for EU AI Act compliance evidence and gaps. Produces a dimension-scored report with per-file findings, architecture graph, and prioritized recommendations.
ai-act-article
Show which analyzers, compliance dimensions, and current findings in this codebase map to a specific EU AI Act article.
ai-act-ask
Answer an EU AI Act question grounded in the bundled knowledge base — verbatim statute text, obligation paraphrases, and the compound-risk taxonomy. Offline and deterministic by default; cites the articles it relies on.
ai-act-settings
View or change the scanner's settings — mode (deterministic vs assisted) and autoapply. Assisted mode lets the plugin use your own Claude Code for semantic scanning, grounded Q&A, and applying fixes.
ai-act-scan-fix
Scan a codebase, then propose concrete remediation (code edits, new files, tests) for the top compliance gaps. Does NOT auto-apply — always shows the plan first.