Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ghosteken/agent-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ghosteken/agent-harness/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00050 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00020 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to review — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Invoke the agent-harness:code-review skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · +19 tokens per session edf9b34728fc
- 22d ago Changed · -11 lines 8e72e1e1f3e5
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 70de75923770
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Ghosteken/agent-harness (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 50 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to review, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
afe
Evaluate feature - code review or comparison (shortcut for feature-eval).
Hexagonal.Gatekeeper
Your role is to perform a deep, architecture-focused code review on a specific branch. You must validate that all changes strictly follow Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters) principles and align with the existing codebase patterns.
factory-ticket
Implement exactly one already-claimed Linear ticket in the current worktree.
mach12:issue-review
Read a GitHub issue and all comments, review the implementation plan, and present findings.
mach12:gh-pr-read
Read a GitHub pull request's title, body, and all top-level PR conversation comments; optionally locate an HTML-marker comment.
review-code
Call getworkflowcommandguidance(kind="design-plan", focus="Architecture focus: inspect saved scripts against their current step objectives, input/output contracts, and relevant retained behavior. Propose improvements without applying them.