Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to glassBead-tc/widescreen-research. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/glassBead-tc/widescreen-research/main/.claude/commands/games/code-review-game.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/glassBead-tc/widescreen-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/glassbead-tc/widescreen-research/code-review-game)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/glassbead-tc/widescreen-research/code-review-game"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/glassbead-tc/widescreen-research/code-review-game.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04203 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02101 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00841 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00420 |
Grade C, and why
code-review-game scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf .code-review-game How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 482 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/code-review-game
Game-theoretic code review protocol that prevents bikeshedding and analysis paralysis while ensuring comprehensive coverage through multi-agent coordination and progressive disclosure.
Usage
/code-review-game "[pr_url_or_branch]" [review_depth] [time_budget] [concern_budget]
Arguments
pr_url_or_branch(required): Pull request URL or branch name to reviewreview_depth(optional): "shallow" | "standard" | "deep" (default: "standard")time_budget(optional): Time limit in minutes (default: 30)concern_budget(optional): Max issues per reviewer agent (default: 5)
Algorithm
Phase 0: Initialize Review Arena
# Create review game state
mkdir -p .code-review-game/{agents,findings,auctions,phases}
# Initialize game state
cat > .code-review-game/state.json << 'EOF'
{
"pr_url": "$PR_URL",
"phase": 0,
"time_remaining": $TIME_BUDGET,
"total_concerns_raised": 0,
"anti_patterns_detected": [],
"review_coverage": {},
"agents": {
"architecture_guardian": {
"expertise": ["design_patterns", "system_boundaries", "abstractions"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 7,
"focus": "forest"
},
"security_auditor": {
"expertise": ["vulnerabilities", "authentication", "data_flow"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 8,
"focus": "critical"
},
"performance_profiler": {
"expertise": ["complexity", "database_queries", "caching"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 6,
"focus": "bottlenecks"
},
"user_advocate": {
"expertise": ["api_design", "error_messages", "documentation"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 5,
"focus": "experience"
},
"maintenance_prophet": {
"expertise": ["code_clarity", "test_coverage", "dependencies"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 6,
"focus": "future"
},
"chaos_monkey": {
"expertise": ["edge_cases", "race_conditions", "failure_modes"],
"concern_budget": $CONCERN_BUDGET,
"severity_threshold": 7,
"focus": "breaking"
}
}
}
EOF
echo "🎮 Code Review Game initialized"
echo "📋 Reviewing: $PR_URL"
echo "⏰ Time budget: $TIME_BUDGET minutes"
echo "🎯 Concern budget per agent: $CONCERN_BUDGET"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 482 lines · 0 tokens per session scan C 39b5b033d2a0
code-review-game is a command published in the GitHub repository glassBead-tc/widescreen-research (6 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,203 tokens. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
review-sdk-app
Review and validate a Claude Agent SDK application against best practices.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.