Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gobing-ai/superskillnpx agentmods add commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gobing-ai/superskill/hook-evaluate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00460 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
hook-evaluate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hook Evaluate
Wraps cc:cc-hooks skill.
Score hook quality across 4 dimensions. Evaluates hooks.json directly — scans for dangerous command patterns, checks event coverage, matcher specificity, and portability. Evaluate only — make NO changes. Delegates to cc:cc-hooks skill.
When to Use
- Scan hooks for dangerous command patterns before deployment
- Check event coverage breadth
- Verify matcher specificity and timeout presence
Arguments
| Argument | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
<nameOrPath> |
Hook name or path to hooks.json | (required) |
--json |
Output machine-readable JSON; with --rubric, emit a scoring work order |
false |
--target |
Target platform | claude |
--save |
Persist the evaluation to the evaluation store (enables evolve trend analysis) | false |
--rubric <file> |
Rubric path for envelope-out scoring | built-in |
--ingest <file> |
Agent-scored result JSON to validate and persist | - |
Examples
# Evaluate the hooks config
/cc:hook-evaluate ./hooks/hooks.json
# Save results for trend analysis
/cc:hook-evaluate ./hooks/hooks.json --save
Implementation
Pass $ARGUMENTS to the underlying skill for processing.
Delegates to cc:cc-hooks skill:
Skill(skill="cc:cc-hooks", args="evaluate $ARGUMENTS")
Direct CLI execution (all platforms):
superskill hook evaluate $ARGUMENTS
Platform Notes
- Claude Code: Invoke via
Skill()delegation - Other platforms: Run
superskillCLI directly via Bash tool
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 0cb22f8acb67
hook-evaluate is a command published in the GitHub repository gobing-ai/superskill (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 460 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
auditar-cascading
Invoca cascading-failures-auditor — audita serviço para 5 triggers de cascade (sem timeout, retry sem jitter, sem circuit breaker, sem deadline, queue unbounded) e gera CASCADING-AUDIT.md.
react-native
Command "react-native" from getsentry/toolkit, covering xcode build step (react-native xcode) and important notes.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.