Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/goern/forgejo-mcp/debategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/goern/forgejo-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/goern/forgejo-mcp/debate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/goern/forgejo-mcp/debate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/goern/forgejo-mcp/debate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00960 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00480 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
Team: Debate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 66 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8ec48dc4f0b1
Team: Debate is a command published in the GitHub repository goern/forgejo-mcp (124 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 960 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
context
项目上下文管理：初始化 .context 目录、记录决策日志、压缩归档、查看历史.
spec-research
需求 → 约束集（并行探索 + OPSX 提案）.
VibeGuard: Cross Review
Dual-model adversarial review — Claude generates review reports, Codex does adversarial verification, and iterates until convergence.
cozempic
Diagnose and prune bloated Claude Code context. Run to slim down the current session before compacting or resuming.
VibeGuard: Review
Structured code review - first run the guard to obtain the baseline, then review according to security → logic → quality → performance priority.
hatch3r-benchmark
Run and analyze performance benchmarks. Compare results against baselines, identify regressions, and produce performance reports.