Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/goktug/ai-crew/testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Goktug/ai-crewWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the ai-crew:test-driven-development skill.
For new features:
- Write tests that describe the expected behavior (they should FAIL)
- Implement the code to make them pass
- Refactor while keeping tests green
For bug fixes (Prove-It pattern):
- Write a test that reproduces the bug (must FAIL)
- Confirm the test fails
- Implement the fix
- Confirm the test passes
- Run the full test suite for regressions
For browser-related issues, also invoke ai-crew:browser-testing-with-devtools to verify with Chrome DevTools MCP.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 20 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A dc892758b8f7
test is a command published in the GitHub repository Goktug/ai-crew (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 152 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
tdd-requirements
TDD開発の要件整理を行います。機能要件を明確化し、テスト駆動開発のための準備を行います。.
go-test
Go TDD workflow with table-driven tests.
pm-auto-design2dev
設計レビューから実装完了まで完全自動化（設計レビュー→作業計画→TDD実装）.
task-verify
PitWay: Run an inprogress task's approved verification command and persist evidence.
execute-plan
Execute an implementation plan methodically with TDD and continuous validation.
tdd
强制执行测试驱动开发工作流。首先搭建接口，生成测试，然后从实现能通过测试的最小代码。确保 80%+ 的覆盖率。.