Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Goldziher/ai-rulezWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/index)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/index/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/index.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00116 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
index scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Concepts
- Build - Build the ai-rulez binary and the project
- Fix - Auto-fix linting, formatting, and common issues
- Lint - Run linting and formatting checks via poly
- Review - Review current changes for correctness, style, and potential issues
- Test Command - A test command for v3.5.0
- Test - Run the project test suite and report results
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 07e2e4c078ee
- 6d ago First seen · 9 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 75eda69b11a4
index is a command published in the GitHub repository Goldziher/ai-rulez (163 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 116 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-11.
Other commands, from other repositories
align
Context-aware alignment. In plan mode it audits the active plan and folds the amendments in. Otherwise it reviews the branch, a named branch, or a pull request against Ion's principles, authors a fix plan, and after approval implements and commits the fixes.
resolve-dependabot-prs
Triage open Dependabot PRs, return a quick risk/action summary table, then enter planning mode with an ordered rebase→merge→follow-up→resume resolution plan.
lint-fix
Run all formatters and linters with auto-fix.
trvl
Route trvl travel requests to trip planning, price watches, destination research, or advanced MCP tools.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.