Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Goldziher/ai-rulezWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/lint-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/lint-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/lint-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/lint-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/goldziher/ai-rulez/lint-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00037 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
lint-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Lint fix
- Run
ruff check --fix $ARGUMENTS. - Run
ruff format $ARGUMENTS. - Run
git diff --statand list the changed files.
Done when both tools exit 0. If either fails, show its last 20 lines of output and stop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 13 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A e46797ecafc4
lint-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository Goldziher/ai-rulez (163 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 93 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-17.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement-python
Senior Python engineer implementation command. Launches a background agent with full Python development capabilities and access to the mastering-python-skill reference materials.
type-coverage
Vérification Couverture des Types Python.
execute-pydantic-ai-prp
Implement a Pydantic AI agent using the PRP file.
python-review
Comprehensive Python code review for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security, and Pythonic idioms. Invokes the python-reviewer agent.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.