Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/adoption-sandbox)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/adoption-sandbox"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/adoption-sandbox/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/adoption-sandbox"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace/adoption-sandbox.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00871 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
adoption-sandbox scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to adoption-sandbox — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/adoption-sandbox
🦉 "Prueba todo, no pasa nada." Sandbox aislado con datos ficticios.
Experimentar libremente sin riesgo: datos de prueba, sin Azure DevOps real, sin commits.
Objetivo
Que los devs y PMs practiquen comandos de Savia con total seguridad antes de usarlos en producción. Feedback inmediato. Sin estrés.
Estructura del Sandbox
sandbox/
├── projects/
│ └── sandbox-demo/
│ ├── CLAUDE.md ← Config sandbox
│ ├── equipo.md ← Team ficticio
│ ├── reglas-negocio.md ← Domain model ficticio
│ └── data/
│ ├── sprints.json ← Sprint data ficticios
│ ├── work-items.json ← PBIs/Tasks ficticias
│ └── board-state.json ← Board snapshot
├── docs/
│ └── sandbox-guide.md ← Guía de qué experimentar
└── .env.sandbox ← Vars de entorno sandbox
Flujo
Paso 1 — Crear sandbox project
- Crear
projects/sandbox-demo/con estructura estándar - Generar datos de prueba: 2 sprints ficticios, 20 PBIs, 5 personas
- Configura
AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECTen.env.sandbox→ null/offline - Copiar plantillas de specs, diagramas, para experimentar
Paso 2 — Habilitar comandos en "safe mode"
- Todos los comandos ejecutan pero NO afectan:
- Azure DevOps real (queries simuladas)
- Repos reales (cambios en memoria, no commits)
- Informes reales (generados en
sandbox/output/)
- Mostrar banner: ⚠️ SANDBOX MODE — cambios no persisten
Paso 3 — Invitar a experimentar
- "Intenta
/sprint-statusaquí — sin riesgo" - "Crea un PBI ficticio con
/pbi-create" - "Genera una spec ficticia con
/spec-generate" - "Escribe código en el sandbox sin commits"
- Feedback inmediato: ✅ esto funcionaría, 🔴 aquí te equivocarías
Paso 4 — Rastrear experimentos
- Log:
sandbox/usage-log.jsoncon cada comando ejecutado - Qué intentó: suceso/error
- Duración: ¿rápido o lento?
- Feedback: ¿comprensible? ¿útil?
Paso 5 — Feedback post-sesión
- Resumen: "Ejecutaste 12 comandos, 11 éxito, 1 confusión"
- Áreas de mejora: "La
/pbi-createpodría ser más clara" - Siguiente paso: "¿Listo para usar esto en tu proyecto real?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 105 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 00b31c0fe5b7
adoption-sandbox is a command published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/pm-workspace (49 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 871 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to adoption-sandbox, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
pre-commit-full
Command: /pre-commit-full Purpose: Comprehensive pre-commit validation orchestrating all error prevention checks.
e2e
Generate comprehensive E2E tests for user workflows using Playwright.
snapshot
Generate and validate visual snapshots for UI components using Playwright.
validate
Full validation with specialized agents (post-change workflow).
test
Generate and run tests for file.
ui-validate
Validate UI component quality.