Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gonzalezpazmonica/saviaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/arch-suggest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/arch-suggest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/arch-suggest/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/arch-suggest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gonzalezpazmonica/savia/arch-suggest.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00867 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
arch-suggest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- arch-suggest — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/arch-suggest {repo|path}
Analiza un proyecto y genera sugerencias priorizadas de mejora arquitectónica.
Prerequisitos
- Ejecutar
/arch-detectprimero (o se ejecutará automáticamente) - Acceso al repositorio
2. Cargar perfil de usuario
- Leer
.claude/profiles/active-user.md→ obteneractive_slug - Si hay perfil activo, cargar (grupo Architecture & Debt del context-map):
profiles/users/{slug}/identity.mdprofiles/users/{slug}/projects.mdprofiles/users/{slug}/preferences.md
- Adaptar profundidad del análisis según
preferences.detail_level - Si no hay perfil → continuar con comportamiento por defecto
3. Parámetros
{repo|path}— Ruta local o nombre del repositorio
4. Flujo de Ejecución
1. Cargar detección previa
Si existe output/architecture/{proyecto}-detection.md, leerlo.
Si no existe, ejecutar /arch-detect primero.
2. Analizar violaciones
Para cada violación del reporte de detección:
- Clasificar severidad: CRITICAL (rompe el patrón) vs WARNING (desvío menor)
- Identificar ficheros afectados
- Proponer solución concreta con ejemplo
3. Identificar oportunidades de refactoring
Buscar:
- God classes/modules: ficheros >300 líneas con múltiples responsabilidades
- Dependencias inversas: módulos de bajo nivel usados por alto nivel
- Código duplicado: patrones repetidos que deberían ser abstracciones
- Missing abstractions: implementaciones directas sin interfaces/traits
- Tight coupling: clases que instancian dependencias (new) en lugar de recibirlas
4. Priorizar por impacto × esfuerzo
Matriz de priorización:
| Esfuerzo Bajo | Esfuerzo Alto | |
|---|---|---|
| Impacto Alto | 🟢 Quick Win | 🟡 Proyecto |
| Impacto Bajo | 🔵 Nice to have | ⚪ Postpone |
5. Generar Reporte
# 🔍 Architecture Suggestions — {proyecto}
**Patrón Detectado**: {nombre} ({score}%)
**Fecha**: {fecha}
## 🟢 Quick Wins (alto impacto, bajo esfuerzo)
1. **{título}** — {descripción}
- Ficheros: {lista}
- Acción: {qué hacer}
- Ejemplo: {antes → después}
## 🟡 Proyectos (alto impacto, alto esfuerzo)
1. **{título}** — {descripción}
- Estimación: {horas}
- Beneficio: {qué mejora}
## 🔵 Nice to Have
1. **{título}** — {descripción}
## ⚠️ Violaciones Críticas a Resolver
1. **{violación}**
- Severidad: CRITICAL
- Impacto: {qué rompe}
- Solución: {cómo arreglarlo}
## 📊 Métricas de Salud Arquitectónica
| Métrica | Valor | Target |
|---------|-------|--------|
| Adherencia al patrón | {n}% | >80% |
| Dependencias inversas | {n} | 0 |
| Ficheros >300 líneas | {n} | 0 |
| Coupling index | {n} | <0.3 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 111 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A edbac89b83d5
arch-suggest is a command published in the GitHub repository gonzalezpazmonica/savia (50 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 867 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
commit
Please summarize your current changes, generate a commit message in English, then add and commit. Never include any AI tool or model as a Co-Author in commit messages. No Co-Authored-By lines referencing AI assistants.
plannotator-review
Open interactive code review for current changes or a PR URL; --base / --diff-type pin the session's opening diff (session-only, git-only).
review
Run code review on files or recent changes.
branch-review
Review a branch before merge [target] [level].
review-preflight
Fast deterministic review preparation without reviewer execution.
review-pending
A code-review command that finds files marked for review in a project, or accepts file paths directly, then sends them to a code-review agent. A sentinel is a small marker file used to record pending work.