gemini-cli: Command for Gemini CLI

.gemini/commands/introspect.toml

introspect is a command for Gemini CLI from google-gemini/gemini-cli. It costs 0 tokens per session (148 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command that examines how system instructions affect a particular action by a coding agent.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review the instructions behind a decision and explain how global, workspace, or project guidance influenced it.
Why use it?
It helps identify which instructions, ambiguities, or conflicts may have shaped an agent’s behavior.

Command for Gemini CLI ✓ vendor

Written for Gemini CLI: installed under .gemini/. Also seen: mentions Gemini CLI.

This is google-gemini/gemini-cli's own configuration. It tells Gemini CLI how to work on gemini-cli itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gemini-cli configures →

About the project

Gemini CLI is a terminal-based AI agent that lets developers interact with Google Gemini models and use tools for tasks such as file operations, shell commands, web fetching, and search. Developers use it from the command line, and the catalogue add-ons extend its workflows and integrations.

google-gemini/gemini-cli · 107,525 stars · on GitHub · geminicli.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to google-gemini/gemini-cli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/main/.gemini/commands/introspect.toml
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for introspect

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for introspect

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/introspect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 148 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00148
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00059
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00030
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00015

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 14fdde3dfb0a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

introspect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.gemini/commands/introspect.toml · 17 lines

What it actually says

description = "Analyze the influence of system instructions on a specific action." prompt = """

Introspection Task

Take a step back and analyze your own system instructions and internal logic. The user is curious about the reasoning behind a specific action or decision you've made.

Specific point of interest: {{args}}

Please provide a detailed breakdown of:

  1. Which parts of your system instructions (global, workspace-specific, or provided via GEMINI.md) influenced this behavior?
  2. What was your internal thought process leading up to this action?
  3. Are there any ambiguities or conflicting instructions that played a role?

Your goal is to provide transparency into your underlying logic so the user can potentially improve the instructions in the future. """

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 14fdde3dfb0a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

introspect is a command published in the GitHub repository google-gemini/gemini-cli (107,525 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 148 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.