pr-review

Review a specific pull request.

Command for Gemini CLI

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/google-gemini/gemini-cli/pr-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 736 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00736
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00368
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00147
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00074

Measured today against content hash c90e5d521621, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.gemini/commands/oncall/pr-review.toml · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

description = "Review a specific pull request"

prompt = """

Mission: Comprehensive Pull Request Review

Today, our mission is to meticulously review community pull requests (PRs) for this project. We will proceed systematically, evaluating each candidate PR for its quality, adherence to standards, and readiness for merging.

Workflow:

  1. PR Preparation & Initial Assessment:

    • You will check out the designated PR {{args}} into a temporary branch.
    • Execute the preflight checks (npm run preflight). This includes building, linting, and running all unit tests.
    • Analyze the output of these preflight checks, noting any failures, warnings, or linting issues.
  2. In-Depth Code Review:

    • Your primary role is to conduct a thorough and in-depth code review of the changes introduced in the PR. Focus your analysis on the following criteria:
      • Correctness: Does the code achieve its stated purpose without bugs or logical errors?
      • Maintainability: Is the code clean, well-structured, and easy to understand and modify in the future? Consider factors like code clarity, modularity, and adherence to established design patterns.
      • Readability: Is the code well-commented (where necessary) and consistently formatted according to our project's coding style guidelines?
      • Efficiency: Are there any obvious performance bottlenecks or resource inefficiencies introduced by the changes?
      • Security: Are there any potential security vulnerabilities or insecure coding practices?
      • Edge Cases and Error Handling: Does the code appropriately handle edge cases and potential errors?
      • Testability: Is the new or modified code adequately covered by tests (even if preflight checks pass)? Suggest additional test cases that would improve coverage or robustness.
    • Based on your analysis, you will determine if the PR is safe to merge.
  3. Reviewing Previous Feedback:

    • Access and examine the PR's history to identify any outstanding requests or unresolved comments from previous reviews. Incorporate these into your current review and explicitly highlight if they have been adequately addressed in the current state of the PR.

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 48 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c90e5d521621

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-review is a command published in the GitHub repository google-gemini/gemini-cli (106,761 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 736 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.