Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gosha70/code-copilot-teamnpx agentmods add commands/gosha70/code-copilot-team/validate-contentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gosha70/code-copilot-team/validate-content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gosha70/code-copilot-team/validate-content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gosha70/code-copilot-team/validate-content.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00336 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
validate-content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/validate-content
Run all content validators locally — same gates the CI workflow pack-content.yml enforces.
Procedure
# 1. Manifest schema check
python - <<'PY'
import sys, yaml
m = yaml.safe_load(open("content/manifest.yaml"))
required = ["name", "version", "schema_version", "content_format", "content_file", "licenses"]
missing = [k for k in required if k not in m]
if missing:
print(f"manifest.yaml missing: {missing}", file=sys.stderr); sys.exit(1)
for k in ("data", "code"):
assert k in m["licenses"], f"licenses.{k} required"
print(f"OK: {m['name']} {m['version']} ({m['content_format']})")
PY
# 2. Content file format validation
xmllint --noout content/data.tbx # for tbx-3.0
# riot --validate content/data.ttl # for turtle
# pyld --validate content/data.jsonld # for json-ld
# 3. Sync round-trip — both wrapper resource dirs must update without error
bash scripts/sync-content.sh
test -f jvm-wrapper/src/main/resources/domain-pack/manifest.yaml
test -f python-wrapper/src/domain_pack/data/manifest.yaml
# 4. Both loaders parse the synced content
(cd jvm-wrapper && ./gradlew test)
(cd python-wrapper && pytest)
If any step fails, fix it before opening a PR. The CI workflow runs the same checks and will block merge on failure.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 37 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ce697962436c
validate-content is a command published in the GitHub repository gosha70/code-copilot-team (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 336 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
python-audit
Run ruff, mypy/pyright, vulture, complexipy/radon and pytest, then report prioritized fixes. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks to audit a Python codebase across lint, types, complexity, dead code and coverage, or to prepare a codebase for release review. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: only one dimension is in scope: restructuring…
python-scaffold
Generate a fresh project skeleton, tests and lint config included. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks to start a new Python project, bootstrap FastAPI/Django/CLI/library structure, or set up uv+pytest+ruff from scratch. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: adding to an existing project (use python-engineer).
comprehensive-unit-testing-with-pytest
Aims for high test coverage using pytest, testing both common and edge cases.
CLAUDE_CODE_F090_SDK_ONLY
JavaScript SDK, Python SDK의 버그 수정 + 누락 기능 추가 + 테스트 작성.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.