cc-sdd is a spec-driven development workflow for coding agents: it turns approved software specifications into requirements, designs, task plans, and extended autonomous implementation. Developers use it across several AI coding agents, with independent review and task-level continuation for long-running work. The catalogue entries provide commands, skills, agents, and instructions for using this workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gotalab/cc-sddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-spec-impl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-spec-impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-spec-impl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-spec-impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-spec-impl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00871 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00348 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
kiro-spec-impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- kiro-spec-impl — 95% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implementation Task Executor
<background_information>
- Mission: Execute implementation tasks using Test-Driven Development methodology based on approved specifications
- Success Criteria:
- All tests written before implementation code
- Code passes all tests with no regressions
- Tasks marked as completed in tasks.md
- Implementation aligns with design and requirements </background_information>
Execution Steps
Step 1: Load Context
Read all necessary context:
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/spec.json,requirements.md,design.md,tasks.md- Entire
{{KIRO_DIR}}/steering/directory for complete project memory
Validate approvals:
- Verify tasks are approved in spec.json (stop if not, see Safety & Fallback)
Step 2: Select Tasks
Determine which tasks to execute:
- If
$2provided: Execute specified task numbers (e.g., "1.1" or "1,2,3") - Otherwise: Execute all pending tasks (unchecked
- [ ]in tasks.md)
Step 3: Execute with TDD
For each selected task, follow Kent Beck's TDD cycle:
-
RED - Write Failing Test:
- Write test for the next small piece of functionality
- Test should fail (code doesn't exist yet)
- Use descriptive test names
-
GREEN - Write Minimal Code:
- Implement simplest solution to make test pass
- Focus only on making THIS test pass
- Avoid over-engineering
-
REFACTOR - Clean Up:
- Improve code structure and readability
- Remove duplication
- Apply design patterns where appropriate
- Ensure all tests still pass after refactoring
-
VERIFY - Validate Quality:
- All tests pass (new and existing)
- No regressions in existing functionality
- Code coverage maintained or improved
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 93d9897e10f3
kiro-spec-impl is a command published in the GitHub repository gotalab/cc-sdd (3,745 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 871 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement-approved-slice
Implement only the approved slice with minimal changes, then persist execution evidence in slice notes and TASKSTATE.md. The official execution path. Opt-in test-first mode via --tdd. Use when the plan and slice are approved, ambiguity is resolved and files in scope are known. Do not use during discovery or planning…
test-strategy
Define the smallest set of meaningful tests that protects behavior and reduces the regression risk for the active task, persisted as TESTSTRATEGY.md. Use when a change affects behavior, contracts, data flow or regression risk, or auth, biometric or runtime-risk scope lacks one, even if small. Do not use when the…
implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
test
Run TDD workflow — write failing tests, implement, verify. For bugs, use the Prove-It pattern.
boss:dev
A development workflow that assigns frontend and backend coding work from an existing task or architecture plan. It follows TDD, or test-driven development: write a failing test, implement the smallest fix, then refactor.
api-aqa-flow
Workflow for backend API test automation: TMS / Issue Tracker test cases → automated API tests, HITL-gated.