Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-validate-implgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gotalab/cc-sddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-validate-impl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-validate-impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gotalab/cc-sdd/kiro-validate-impl.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01281 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00641 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00256 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00128 |
Grade A, and why
kiro-validate-impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implementation Validation
<background_information>
- Mission: Verify that implementation aligns with approved requirements, design, and tasks
- Success Criteria:
- All specified tasks marked as completed
- Tests exist and pass for implemented functionality
- Requirements traceability confirmed (EARS requirements covered)
- Design structure reflected in implementation
- No regressions in existing functionality </background_information>
Execution Steps
1. Detect Validation Target
If no arguments provided ($1 empty):
- Parse conversation history for
/prompts:kiro-spec-impl <feature> [tasks]commands - Extract feature names and task numbers from each execution
- Aggregate all implemented tasks by feature
- Report detected implementations (e.g., "user-auth: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3")
- If no history found, scan
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/for features with completed tasks[x]
If feature provided ($1 present, $2 empty):
- Use specified feature
- Detect all completed tasks
[x]in{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/$1/tasks.md
If both feature and tasks provided ($1 and $2 present):
- Validate specified feature and tasks only (e.g.,
user-auth 1.1,1.2)
2. Load Context
For each detected feature:
- Read
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/<feature>/spec.jsonfor metadata - Read
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/<feature>/requirements.mdfor requirements - Read
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/<feature>/design.mdfor design structure - Read
{{KIRO_DIR}}/specs/<feature>/tasks.mdfor task list - Load ALL steering context: Read entire
{{KIRO_DIR}}/steering/directory including:- Default files:
structure.md,tech.md,product.md - All custom steering files (regardless of mode settings)
- Default files:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 141 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 117a910084d2
kiro-validate-impl is a command published in the GitHub repository gotalab/cc-sdd (3,646 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,281 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
evaluate
Evaluate a skill across model tiers using blind testing.
ai-feature-eval-harness
Design an evaluation plan for a product AI feature (LLM- or model-backed output): measurable success criteria, a held-out labeled eval dataset shape, per-criterion grading (code-based first, then LLM-based for nuanced judgment), and a pass threshold, then persist as AIEVALPLAN.md. Use when the task ships or changes a…
api-contract-review
Review an API contract (endpoints, request/response shapes, error codes, auth model) BEFORE implementation for naming consistency, versioning, pagination, idempotency, and alignment with existing endpoints. Distinct from review-hard (post-implementation risk) and repo-consistency-sweep (pattern matching on written…
api-runtime-verify
Verify an implemented backend HTTP surface at runtime: per route, record the request actually made, the HTTP status, the response content-type, and the observed body shape, assert each response against the slice's acceptance behavior, classify the findings, and decide a PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED runtime gate. The probe's real…
app-runtime-verify
Verify a built mobile or app runtime at runtime: run the app (device, emulator, or headless), read the captured runtime output (native logcat, iOS device log, or the Metro/JS console), classify any runtime errors against a per-stack taxonomy, and decide a PASS/FAIL runtime gate for the slice's acceptance behavior. The…
apply-sweep-triage
Persist the user's triage decisions (apply, decline, discuss) from a SWEEP snapshot into REVIEWPREFERENCES.md so future sweeps suppress declined findings and track applied fixes. Use after the user has edited the triage values in a SWEEP snapshot file produced by repo-consistency-sweep. Do not use when no sweep…