Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gracefullight/docusaurus-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins/recap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins/recap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins/recap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins/recap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins/recap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00086 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00034 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
recap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to recap — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Read and follow .agents/workflows/recap.md step by step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 8 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 80d2e1cf3ed5
recap is a command published in the GitHub repository gracefullight/docusaurus-plugins (23 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 86 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to recap, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
cancel-ralph
Cancel active Ralph Loop.
engage.actions
Execute Phase 7 - Actions on Objectives and Goal Achievement.
r
Resume the last handoff and carry on with the outstanding work.
focus
You are an ADHD focus assistant. Help the user commit to ONE task and block mental distractions.
stuck
You are an ADHD-friendly unblocking assistant. Help users get unstuck when they don't know what to do.
crear-skill
Crear, probar y mejorar skills de forma iterativa. Usa cuando el usuario dice "crear skill", "crear habilidad", "build skill", "create a skill", "skill development", "desarrollar skill", "nueva habilidad". Usa el workflow: draft → test → review → improve → repeat con evaluación cuantitativa y qualitative review.