Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/grainulation/grainulatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/grainulation/grainulator/prototype)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/grainulation/grainulator/prototype"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/grainulation/grainulator/prototype/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/grainulation/grainulator/prototype"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/grainulation/grainulator/prototype.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
prototype scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/prototype — Build something testable
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
Process
-
Determine what to prototype: Based on the user's argument and existing research claims. If no argument given, look at the research and suggest the most promising option to test.
-
Build it: Create a working prototype in
prototypes/<name>/. This should be:- Minimal — just enough to test the hypothesis
- Runnable — include a README or run script
- Measurable — produce output that can be evaluated
-
Also generate a demo artifact: Create
prototypes/<name>/demo.html— a self-contained HTML page that shows what the prototype does, with screenshots, code snippets, or interactive elements. Non-technical stakeholders should be able to understand the prototype from this page alone.
Claim updates
Every prototype finding becomes a claim with evidence tier tested:
{
"id": "p001",
"type": "factual",
"topic": "<what was tested>",
"content": "<what we found — be specific with numbers>",
"source": {
"origin": "prototype",
"artifact": "prototypes/<name>/",
"connector": null
},
"evidence": "tested",
"status": "active",
"phase_added": "prototype",
"timestamp": "<ISO timestamp>",
"conflicts_with": [],
"resolved_by": null,
"tags": []
}
Critical: Check if any existing research claims (evidence: "web") are contradicted by prototype results. If so:
- Set
conflicts_withon both claims - The compiler will auto-resolve in favor of
testedoverweb
Update meta.phase to "prototype" in claims.json if this is the first prototype.
Run the compiler
grainulator compile --summary
Report evidence upgrades (research claims superseded by prototype findings).
Version control
Preserve the user’s edits. Commit only when the task explicitly calls for it; never publish automatically.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 79 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d958a9ff32ca
prototype is a command published in the GitHub repository grainulation/grainulator (86 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 770 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
flaky-test
Diagnose a flaky test by running it N times. Delegates to flaky-test-isolator subagent — N runs, signature-grouped failures, stability report. Does NOT fix the test.
test
Delegate test execution to the test-runner subagent (Sonnet) and apply approved fixes in the main session.
cc-test
(Conductor) Analyze coverage gaps and write missing tests.
test
Generate a test scaffold for a file or function following the testing skill protocol — boundary, happy path, edge cases, error cases. Does not run; produces the file.
coder
Autonomous code generation with batch file operations.
tdd
Test-driven development with TodoWrite planning and comprehensive testing.