Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to GregBaugues/tokenbowl-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GregBaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/main/.claude/commands/startsit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GregBaugues/tokenbowl-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gregbaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/startsit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gregbaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/startsit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gregbaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/startsit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gregbaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/startsit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gregbaugues/tokenbowl-mcp/startsit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00913 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00456 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
startsit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Start/Sit Analysis
Analyze the Bill Beliclaude roster (Roster ID 2) and provide detailed start/sit recommendations for the current week.
Goal
Construct optimal weekly lineup by:
- Analyzing all roster players (starters + bench)
- Identifying bye week players (cannot start)
- Evaluating matchups and recent form
- Making flex decisions based on upside
- Assessing defense streaming options
Reference: See .claude/reference/_fantasy_framework.md for evaluation criteria.
Execution Phases
Phase 1: Gather Roster Data
get_roster(roster_id=2)
Extract:
- Current week number (use this for ALL subsequent operations)
- All starters and bench players with projections
- Each player's bye_week field
get_nfl_schedule(week=<week_from_roster_data>)
Shows game times and matchups for context.
CRITICAL: Identify bye week players by comparing player.bye_week == current_week. These players have 0.0 projected points and cannot be started.
Phase 2: Player Analysis
Use the fantasy-player-analyst subagent to analyze ALL roster players (starters + bench).
Week outlooks: MUST START / START / FLEX / SIT / ON BYE
Critical: Flag bye week players (bye_week == current_week) as "ON BYE THIS WEEK - Cannot start"
Phase 3: Lineup Construction
Step 1: Lock in MUST START Players
- QB, RB1, RB2, WR1, WR2, TE if no better option
- Exclude any player where bye_week == current_week
Step 2: Identify Flex Competition
- List all viable flex candidates (WR3+, RB3+, TE2 if applicable)
- EXCLUDE any player on bye this week
- Compare: projections, matchups, recent form
- Rank by: Ceiling > Floor > Consistency
Step 3: Defense Evaluation
Use the defense-streaming-analyst subagent to:
- Compare current DEF projection vs top 3 available
- Get clear recommendation: STREAM / HOLD / CONSIDER
- Include specific streaming options with projections
Always evaluate defense streaming - it's free points on the table.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 122 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 62296602ae12
startsit is a command published in the GitHub repository GregBaugues/tokenbowl-mcp (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 913 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.