Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/griddynamics/rosetta/adhoc-flowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/adhoc-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/adhoc-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/adhoc-flow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01450 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00725 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
adhoc-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<adhoc_flow>
<description_and_purpose>
Problem: Fixed workflows cannot cover the combinatorial space of real requests; orchestrators lock into rigid classification. Solution: Meta-workflow — construct a bespoke plan from building blocks, review, execute with tracking. Each user turn can extend, adapt, or restart.
If request is trivial / one-liner AND you confirmed it is true (by checking code / instructions fallback to ask user) only then you are allowed to just directly execute it without extra complications of this skill => otherwise you must fully follow this and orchestration skills.
</description_and_purpose>
- large (smart, slow): claude-opus-5, gpt-5.6-terra-high, gpt-5.6-sol-high, gemini-3.7-flash-high, kimi-k3, glm-5.2
- medium (workhorse): claude-sonnet-5, gpt-5.6-terra-medium, glm-5, kimi-k2.5, minimax-m2.5, grok-4.6
- small (fast): claude-haiku-4-5, gpt-5.6-luna, gpt-5.6-luna-medium, gemini-3.7-flash-low
Match to cognitive demand. Match to current tool.
- MUST USE SKILL
orchestrationwith team management, which is the core mechanism of this workflow. - Workflow state MUST be saved to
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/adhoc-flow-state.mdfile.
<building_blocks>
Compose any of these (not limited) into plan phases/steps to build any execution workflow:
- discover-research: scan project context and KB; research external knowledge if needed; deliver summarized references
- requirements-capture: reverse-engineer or interrogate requirements; persist intent as source of truth
- reasoning-decomposition: USE SKILL
reasoning(8D) to decompose into sub-problems with decisions and trade-offs - plan-wbs: USE SKILL
planningto build sequenced WBS - tech-specs: USE SKILL
tech-specsto generate target technical implementation specs; makes AI to figure out entire solution, instead of discovering something as a surprise - subagent-delegation: provide role + context/refs; route parallel/sequential; enforce focus — report back if off-plan
- delegate-but-verify: use subagent delegation, but verify both reasoning and results
- critically-review: critically review inputs, outputs, reasoning, completeness, ambiguity, results of user, subagents, tools, scripts, etc.
- execute-track: EXECUTION_CONTROLLER
next→ execute →update_status;upsertto adapt mid-execution; loop - modify-review: modify then review with different agent/model
- review-validate: review (static inspection against intent) + validate (run locally, call/use local, runtime evidence on real tasks)
- memory-learn: root-cause failures → reusable preventive rules → update AGENT MEMORY.md
- hitl-gate: present summary to user; block until explicit approval
- simulate: walk through plan with use cases; verify cognitive load and phase boundaries
- draft-improve: short core draft → improve one non-conflicting aspect at a time
- ralph-loop: execute → review → update task memory with root causes → loop
- use: use existing skills, agents, workflows
- plan-sessions: create plan (one file, with refs to per-session files) and implementation specs for each session for workhorse model (sonnet 5, gpt-5.6-terra, so you need to provide more details) in multiple files in order of execution, so that it can be given one-by-one in different sessions of subagents.
- Do not duplicate: existing files, instructions, protocols => instead use references "file-name:line-ranges".
</building_blocks>
<workflow_phases>
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed
- MUST USE SKILL
load-project-context,orchestration(with team manager, execution controller is size dependent),hitl - MUST ALWAYS use todo tasks ledger, ASAP. Phases are sequential. Independent tasks can run in parallel.
- MUST use available MCPs, tools, skills and agents.
- You will FOR SURE run out of LLM context, leading to loss of information, delegate to subagents!
- If
/goalis set repeat phases 4-5 until goal is met.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 135 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 11e2310a0893
adhoc-flow is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,450 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
resolve-conflicts
Resolve merge conflicts on a GitHub PR by merging the base branch into the PR branch in an isolated git worktree, with JSON/markdown-aware conflict resolution.
ship
Commit all changes and push to remote in one operation (combines /commit and /push).