arrange-workspace-flow

arrange-workspace-flow is a command for coding agents from griddynamics/rosetta. It costs 26 tokens per session (1,277 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Workflow for arranging a workspace: layout, reference source code, business/technical context, ecosystem setup.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/griddynamics/rosetta/arrange-workspace-flow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosetta

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for arrange-workspace-flow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/arrange-workspace-flow.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/arrange-workspace-flow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/arrange-workspace-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/arrange-workspace-flow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,277 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00026 $0.01277
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00639
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00255
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00128

Measured today against content hash 221044db74bc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

arrange-workspace-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/core-copilot-light/commands/arrange-workspace-flow.md · 114 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

<description_and_purpose> Guide user through workspace arrangement: layout, reference code, business/technical context, modernization docs (if applicable), ecosystem tools. Close gaps, contradictions, undocumented decisions in CONTEXT.md/ARCHITECTURE.md. </description_and_purpose>

<workflow_phases>

<choose_workspace_layout phase="1" applies="ALL">

  1. Show layout options verbatim, help user pick one, guide setup actions.
  2. APPLY PHASE arrange-workspace-flow-choose-workspace-layout.md
  3. No choice recorded → re-ask, do not default.
  4. Update arrange-state.md.

</choose_workspace_layout>

<reference_source_code phase="2" applies="Single Repo Workspace (Option 1)">

  1. Onboard read-only reference code into refsrc/, documented in refsrc/INDEX.md.
  2. Layout ≠ Single Repo Workspace (Option 1) → skip, record skip reason, proceed to phase 3.
  3. APPLY PHASE arrange-workspace-flow-reference-source-code.md
  4. Update arrange-state.md.

</reference_source_code>

<business_context phase="3" applies="ALL">

  1. Interview user to gather missing business context into CONTEXT.md.
  2. APPLY PHASE arrange-workspace-flow-business-context.md
  3. Update arrange-state.md. </business_context>

<technical_context phase="4" applies="ALL">

  1. Interview user to gather missing technical context into ARCHITECTURE.md.
  2. APPLY PHASE arrange-workspace-flow-technical-context.md
  3. Update arrange-state.md. </technical_context>

<configure_ecosystem phase="6" applies="ALL">

  1. Show MCP/CLI/plugin recommendations; guide install only if user decides to.
  2. APPLY PHASE arrange-workspace-flow-configure-ecosystem.md
  3. Update arrange-state.md. </configure_ecosystem>

</workflow_phases>

<next_steps>

  1. DEMAND user as MUST to start new chat session (highly visible message, red icon, bold, ASCII art, it must standout).

  2. DEMAND user to study (USAGE GUIDE)[https://griddynamics.github.io/rosetta/docs/usage-guide/]

  3. DEMAND user to review examples for the next steps for user and EMPHASIS on "/slash-commands":

    # Coding Workflow
    
    **WHAT**: Majority of tasks are actually coding tasks, including unit tests. Just ask exactly what is required.
    
    "/coding-flow Implement left navigation sidebar on the home page, ..."
    
    "/coding-flow Identify and implement fix, ..."
    
    "/coding-flow Improve unit tests coverage to 85% for ..."
    
    # Business and Technical Requirements
    
    **WHY**: Requirements - is the source of truth for code and tests. Going requirements first is the most effective. In brownfield start with extracting.
    
    "/requirements-authoring-flow extract detailed business and technical requirements from community of ... using subagents. Additionally, ... . Once done spawn subagent to validate and repeat an entire loop until there are no issues detected."
    
    "/requirements-authoring-flow extract high-level business and technical requirements at end-point level for controllers according to glob ... using subagents. Additionally, ... . Once done spawn subagent to validate and repeat an entire loop until there are no issues detected."
    
    # Modernization
    
    **FIRST**: Document modernization goals in CONTEXT.md, document target services technical aspects in ARCHITECTURE.md, document where source code should be created, keep refsrc populated with reference code source (old code, new code, reusable libraries, configuration and documentation files, and similar).
    
    **NOTE**: All phases are must. All phases to be implemented one-by-one with proper review. Phase 3: Pre-Modernization Test Coverage is a must (and must include both unit and integration/e2e tests).
    
    "/modernization-flow Perform modernization phase 1 to reuse library refsrc/... using subagents." 
    
    "/modernization-flow Perform modernization phase 2 to analyze service module ... using subagents. Target microservice name is ... ."
    
    "/modernization-flow Perform modernization phase 8 for target service to analyze service module ... using subagents. Must USE FLOW `coding-flow.md` to actually implement and as the main flow. Once done spawn subagent to validate and repeat an entire loop until there are no issues detected."
    

</next_steps>

Read the full file on GitHub · 114 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 114 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 221044db74bc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

arrange-workspace-flow is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,277 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.