modernization-flow-crossproject

modernization-flow-crossproject is a command for coding agents from griddynamics/rosetta. It costs 16 tokens per session (835 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Phase 5 Cross-Project Analysis of modernization-flow.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/griddynamics/rosetta/modernization-flow-crossproject
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosetta

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for modernization-flow-crossproject

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/modernization-flow-crossproject.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/modernization-flow-crossproject)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/modernization-flow-crossproject"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/modernization-flow-crossproject.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 835 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00835
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00417
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00167
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00084

Measured today against content hash 00b663cf0c83, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

modernization-flow-crossproject scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/core-copilot-light/commands/modernization-flow-crossproject.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Modernization Phase 5: Cross-Project Analysis

Phase Flow

Phase 5: Cross-Project Analysis

  1. Complete Phase 4 first
  2. Identify similarities and inconsistencies
  3. Document patterns across projects
  4. Map cross-project flows
  5. Document proxy patterns
  6. Cleanup assumptions and unknowns
  7. Identify migration priority order
  8. Create cross-project-analysis file
  9. Compact and re-validate

Context

PREREQUISITES: Complete Phase 4 (all class group analyses complete)

OBJECTIVES:

  • Identify similarities and inconsistencies across projects
  • Identify patterns used across projects
  • Map cross-project usage and references
  • Document proxy patterns and replacement opportunities
  • Cleanup assumptions and unknowns
  • Identify migration / modernization priority order

Implement Flow Phases

  1. Read all source files required
  2. Create docs/cross-project-analysis.md
  3. Update all docs/original-code-specs-<lib/project>.md
  4. Revalidate changes are complete, consistent, and full

Requirements

  • MUST analyze ALL docs/reference-code-specs-<lib/project>.md files together
  • MUST analyze ALL docs/original-code-specs-<lib/project>.md files together (and update!)
  • MUST analyze both docs/LEGACY-INTERFACES-CATALOG.md, docs/TODO.md (if they exist).
  • MUST create todo tasks for each phase and also split phase for each original code spec file to update. Also split validation phase as well.
  • MUST update original-* files in place to add cross-project flows and dependencies, put direct references to reference-* and other original-* files.
  • MUST create explicit follow-up tasks for ambiguities
  • MUST create docs/cross-project-analysis.md as a single file!
  • MUST check assumptions and unknowns and cleanup those which are addressed (update respective parts of te original document and remove element completely from this section).
  • MUST create tasks to compact used context of LLM, then tasks to re-read all files to perform full re-read and re-validation of contents to be completed work. Do not output new file or any summary, just fix gaps, issues, inconsistencies.

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 101 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 00b663cf0c83

Subscribe to this mod's changes

modernization-flow-crossproject is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 835 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.