Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/research-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/research-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/research-flow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/research-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/research-flow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00655 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
research-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
<research_flow>
<description_and_purpose> Orchestrates deep research via meta-prompting: craft an optimized research prompt, then execute it in a dedicated subagent. </description_and_purpose>
<workflow_phases>
<prerequisites phase="0", applies="ALL">
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed
- USE SKILL
load-project-context,orchestration,hitl - MUST ALWAYS use todo tasks ledger, ASAP. Phases are sequential. Independent tasks can run in parallel.
- Orchestrator trusts the system and skills; coordinates sequence, artifacts, state, and approvals only.
- Workflow state MUST be saved to
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/research-flow-state.mdfile. - If
/goalis set repeat phases 3-4 until goal is met.
<context_load phase="1" subagent="researcher" role="Context gatherer for research scope" subagent_required_model="Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Luna, Gemini 3.8 Flash">
- Read all lines from CONTEXT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and IMPLEMENTATION.md.
- Input: user research request. Output: loaded project context.
- Update
research-flow-state.md.
</context_load>
<prompt_craft phase="2" subagent="researcher" role="Research prompt architect" subagent_required_model="Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-6.1 Sol, Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 3.8 Flash">
- Create an optimized research prompt for the user request.
- Save as
research-prompt.mdin FEATURE PLAN folder. Output ONLY the optimized prompt. - Input: user request + project context. Output:
research-prompt.md. - Required skills:
reasoning - Update
research-flow-state.md. - HITL approval of research prompt before execution.
</prompt_craft>
<execute_research phase="3" subagent="researcher" role="Deep research executor" subagent_required_model="Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Luna, Gemini 3.8 Flash">
- Execute the approved research prompt as a separate subagent.
- Input: approved
research-prompt.md. Output:docs/<feature>-research.md. - Required skills:
research - Update
research-flow-state.md.
</execute_research>
- Finalize
docs/<feature>-research.md. - Input: completed research document. Output: finalized research document.
- Update
research-flow-state.mdand mark complete.
</workflow_phases>
</research_flow>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago Changed 32c066fbb4f8
- 14d ago Changed b1beeaffb2f6
- 1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 20837ca5ec2e
research-flow is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (363 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.