Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02122 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01061 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00424 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<ui_aqa_flow_test_implementation>
<description_and_purpose> Create the automated UI test integrating all page objects and assertions from the test plan, validate it locally (lint-clean), then hand execution off to the user. The phase implements → validates → hands off → updates state without closing the workflow. </description_and_purpose>
<workflow_context>
- Phase 6 of 8 in
ui-aqa-flow - Input: complete test plan
plans/ui-aqa-<test-name>/test-plan.md(all phases), page objects ready from Phase 5 - Output: implemented test file, lint-clean; state updated; user given an execution command
- Prerequisite: Phases 1-5 complete
- HITL: must stop and wait for the user to execute the test (this phase does not run it)
- Write boundary (single SSoT — referenced by other sections): writes ONLY test files (and the test plan's
## Test Implementationrecord). NO edits to application source or page-object files — a missing selector/method routes back to Phase 5, never authored inline here. - Required skills:
qa-knowledge(implementation_modes— UI impl + the Test Implementation record),qa-structure(<test-name>paths + state shape) - Recommended skills:
testing,coding(repo conventions) </workflow_context>
<implementation_handoff_contract>
This phase OWNS the implement → validate-locally → hand-off-execution → update-state-without-closing contract. It is verified by <validation_checklist> independent of skill internals.
- Implement — author the test via
qa-knowledgeimplementation_modes(UI impl) against the plan; USE SKILLtestingfor general test quality; usecodingfor repo conventions (read repo standards as authority; repo docs win). - Validate locally — lint/format clean on the touched test file; every Phase 2 assertion implemented OR recorded in the test plan's
### Uncovered Assertions(silent drop forbidden). - Hand off execution — provide the exact project test-execution command; STOP and WAIT for the user to run it (
<stop_for_execution>). The phase never executes the test itself. - Update state without closing — record outcome in
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/ui-aqa-state.md, mark Phase 6 complete, set Phase 7 current; do NOT mark the overall UI-AQA workflow COMPLETE.
Test Implementation record → qa-knowledge's UI test-implementation record (full rendering template owned by the skill). Five ordered subsections: Test File (path · framework); Implementation Summary (assertions implemented/total · page objects used); Uncovered Assertions (per entry: assertion · reason · disposition); Conflicts and Precedence (doc-vs-skill conflict · resolution); Validation (lint status · coverage).
</implementation_handoff_contract>
<phase_steps>
- Implement and validate the test locally (step 6.1)
- Validate against requirements (step 6.2)
- Stop for user test execution (step 6.3)
- Update state (step 6.4) </phase_steps>
<execute_implementation step="6.1" subagent="engineer" role="Test automation engineer">
- USE SKILL
qa-structureto resolve run paths/state. USE SKILLcodingto read the repository standards as authority before authoring; repo docs beat model defaults. - USE SKILL
qa-knowledge(implementation_modes— UI impl) and USE SKILLtestingwith the parent-supplied bindings: test plan pathplans/ui-aqa-<test-name>/test-plan.md; write boundary = test files only (<workflow_context>); output record = the Test Implementation record per<implementation_handoff_contract>. - Author the test using page-object methods only (no raw selectors in test code), proper waits, project assertion style. If a required selector or page-object method is missing, do NOT author it inline — stop and route back to Phase 5 (selector implementation).
- Record every plan assertion that cannot be implemented in the test plan's
### Uncovered Assertionswith the reason. Silent drop is forbidden. - Validate locally: run the project lint/format command on the touched test file and resolve issues; emit the Test Implementation record.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 115 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 384bc1926d8f
ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,122 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
resolve-conflicts
Resolve merge conflicts on a GitHub PR by merging the base branch into the PR branch in an isolated git worktree, with JSON/markdown-aware conflict resolution.
xpoz-best-practices
Reference docs for Xpoz query syntax, pagination, field selection, platform tools, and authentication. Usage: /xpoz-best-practices.
align
Verify spec-vs-spec alignment and brevity across the intent tree. This is NOT QA — QA checks code against a spec; alignment checks whether specs are consistent with their ancestors and internally tight against the Brevity Contract. The aligner runs three passes per walk.
deploy-check
Pre-flight verification before pushing to main. Reproduces the CI gates locally so the push doesn't fail in production.
validate-fix
Validate a proposed React fix with React-Sentinel assertions or replay checks.
rclone_mkdir
Make the path if it doesn't already exist.