ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation

ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation is a command for coding agents from griddynamics/rosetta. It costs 18 tokens per session (2,122 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Phase 6 Test Implementation of ui-aqa-flow.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosetta

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,122 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00018 $0.02122
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.01061
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00424
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00212

Measured today against content hash 384bc1926d8f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/core-copilot-light/commands/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation.md · 115 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

<ui_aqa_flow_test_implementation>

<description_and_purpose> Create the automated UI test integrating all page objects and assertions from the test plan, validate it locally (lint-clean), then hand execution off to the user. The phase implements → validates → hands off → updates state without closing the workflow. </description_and_purpose>

<workflow_context>

  • Phase 6 of 8 in ui-aqa-flow
  • Input: complete test plan plans/ui-aqa-<test-name>/test-plan.md (all phases), page objects ready from Phase 5
  • Output: implemented test file, lint-clean; state updated; user given an execution command
  • Prerequisite: Phases 1-5 complete
  • HITL: must stop and wait for the user to execute the test (this phase does not run it)
  • Write boundary (single SSoT — referenced by other sections): writes ONLY test files (and the test plan's ## Test Implementation record). NO edits to application source or page-object files — a missing selector/method routes back to Phase 5, never authored inline here.
  • Required skills: qa-knowledge (implementation_modes — UI impl + the Test Implementation record), qa-structure (<test-name> paths + state shape)
  • Recommended skills: testing, coding (repo conventions) </workflow_context>

<implementation_handoff_contract> This phase OWNS the implement → validate-locally → hand-off-execution → update-state-without-closing contract. It is verified by <validation_checklist> independent of skill internals.

  • Implement — author the test via qa-knowledge implementation_modes (UI impl) against the plan; USE SKILL testing for general test quality; use coding for repo conventions (read repo standards as authority; repo docs win).
  • Validate locally — lint/format clean on the touched test file; every Phase 2 assertion implemented OR recorded in the test plan's ### Uncovered Assertions (silent drop forbidden).
  • Hand off execution — provide the exact project test-execution command; STOP and WAIT for the user to run it (<stop_for_execution>). The phase never executes the test itself.
  • Update state without closing — record outcome in agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/ui-aqa-state.md, mark Phase 6 complete, set Phase 7 current; do NOT mark the overall UI-AQA workflow COMPLETE.

Test Implementation recordqa-knowledge's UI test-implementation record (full rendering template owned by the skill). Five ordered subsections: Test File (path · framework); Implementation Summary (assertions implemented/total · page objects used); Uncovered Assertions (per entry: assertion · reason · disposition); Conflicts and Precedence (doc-vs-skill conflict · resolution); Validation (lint status · coverage). </implementation_handoff_contract>

<phase_steps>

  1. Implement and validate the test locally (step 6.1)
  2. Validate against requirements (step 6.2)
  3. Stop for user test execution (step 6.3)
  4. Update state (step 6.4) </phase_steps>

<execute_implementation step="6.1" subagent="engineer" role="Test automation engineer">

  1. USE SKILL qa-structure to resolve run paths/state. USE SKILL coding to read the repository standards as authority before authoring; repo docs beat model defaults.
  2. USE SKILL qa-knowledge (implementation_modes — UI impl) and USE SKILL testing with the parent-supplied bindings: test plan path plans/ui-aqa-<test-name>/test-plan.md; write boundary = test files only (<workflow_context>); output record = the Test Implementation record per <implementation_handoff_contract>.
  3. Author the test using page-object methods only (no raw selectors in test code), proper waits, project assertion style. If a required selector or page-object method is missing, do NOT author it inline — stop and route back to Phase 5 (selector implementation).
  4. Record every plan assertion that cannot be implemented in the test plan's ### Uncovered Assertions with the reason. Silent drop is forbidden.
  5. Validate locally: run the project lint/format command on the touched test file and resolve issues; emit the Test Implementation record.

Read the full file on GitHub · 115 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 115 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 384bc1926d8f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation is a command published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (342 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 2,122 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.