Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/master/.claude/commands/update-license-docs.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/update-license-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/update-license-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/update-license-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/update-license-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server/update-license-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00475 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00237 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
update-license-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Update the package license documentation for $1 version $2 with license $3.
Update Process
-
Read current docs/package-licenses.md to understand the existing format and find the package entry
-
Determine update type:
- New package: Add new row to the appropriate table (Runtime Dependencies or Development Dependencies)
- Version update: Update existing package version
- License change: Update license field and add note about the change
-
Update the markdown table:
- Locate the correct table (Runtime Dependencies vs Development Dependencies)
- Find or create the package row:
| $1 | $2 | $3 | ✅ | ${4:-Version update} | - Maintain alphabetical ordering within each table
- Ensure consistent formatting with existing entries
-
Update metadata:
- Change "Last updated" date to today's date (2025-01-19)
- Keep "Package.json version" as 1.0.0 unless the package.json version field has changed
-
Add notes if provided:
- If $4 is provided, use it in the Notes column
- For license changes, format as: "License changed from [old] to [new]"
- For new packages, use: "New dependency added"
- For version updates with same license, use: "Version update"
Table Format Reference
| Package | Version | License | Compatible | Notes |
|---------|---------|---------|------------|-------|
| package-name | x.y.z | MIT | ✅ | Description |
Validation Checklist
Before saving the updated file:
- Package is in the correct table (runtime vs dev dependencies)
- Version format is consistent (x.y.z)
- License name matches npm registry format
- Compatible column shows ✅ (since we only update compatible packages)
- Notes column has meaningful information
- "Last updated" date is current
- Markdown table formatting is preserved
This command should only be used after /check-license has confirmed compatibility.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 52 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 246b661d1241
update-license-docs is a command published in the GitHub repository gui-wf/purelymail-mcp-server (8 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 475 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.