Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GuillemRoca/agent-skills-androidWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/constraints)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/constraints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/constraints/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/constraints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/guillemroca/agent-skills-android/constraints.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00976 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00390 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
constraints scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 38 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/constraints — Constraint-Driven Development
Define and enforce this project's quality bar: detect, interview, sane defaults, CONSTRAINTS.md.
Instructions
Load and follow these skills:
constraint-driven-developmentfromskills/constraint-driven-development/SKILL.mdinterview-mefromskills/interview-me/SKILL.md(question discipline for the intake)
$ARGUMENTS
Default behaviour with no arguments: set up constraints for this repository.
-
Detect first. Read
settings.gradle.kts, modulebuild.gradle.ktsfiles,gradle/libs.versions.toml,minSdk/targetSdk, the test stack (JUnit4/5, MockK, Turbine, Robolectric, Compose UI test),lint.xml/lint-baseline.xml,detekt.ymland its baseline,.editorconfig(ktlint), Kover or JaCoCo config,.github/workflows/, andAGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md. Report what you found in two lines. Never ask for anything you can read. -
Interview, at most four questions. One at a time, each with your best guess and a usable default so "I don't know" still produces a working config:
- Which dimensions beyond the floor (coverage, static analysis, security, performance, accessibility, module boundaries)
- Block or warn when a check fails mid-task
- Target numbers, or measure today's values and hold them
- Slowest check tolerated before handing work back
-
Write
CONSTRAINTS.mdat the repo root: Floor, Enforced with numbers (each row names its Gradle task or command and where it runs), Measured not yet enforced (today's value + direction), Exceptions (owner + expiry). Every number needs a stated reason. -
Install what each picked dimension needs. Use the de facto tool so existing config keeps working: Android Lint (
abortOnError,warningsAsErrors) and detekt for static analysis, ktlint via Spotless for formatting, Kover (koverVerifyrules) or JaCoCo for coverage, Konsist or dependency-analysis-gradle-plugin for module boundaries, gitleaks (always--redact) for secrets, Gradle dependency verification + osv-scanner or OWASP dependency-check for dependencies, Macrobenchmark + Baseline Profiles and an APK size diff for performance,AccessibilityChecks.enable()/ Compose semantics tests for accessibility, Pitest for mutation testing on JVM modules. Macrobenchmark and instrumented accessibility checks need a device; with no emulator in CI, keep them measured-only and say so. RegistercheckFast/checkTask/checkFullGradle tasks that mirrorCONSTRAINTS.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 38 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A acd43c2932f3
constraints is a command published in the GitHub repository GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android (4 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 976 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
al-agent-test
Generate comprehensive test codeunits for Business Central Agent SDK integrations. Covers 6 categories: Registration, Factory, Metadata, TaskExecution, TaskIntegration, AgentSession. ALDC workflow (Copilot prompt al-agent.test); invoke explicitly.
6_gofer_validate
Validate implemented work with evidence-backed scoring, blast-radius analysis, and engineering review.
9_gofer_tests
Generate comprehensive test suites from four testing perspectives for a target component.
tdd
Test-driven development with TodoWrite planning and comprehensive testing.
tester
Comprehensive testing with parallel execution capabilities.
gofer:tdd
Guide a red-green-refactor loop tied to spec acceptance criteria.