speckit-checklist

speckit-checklist is a command for Claude Code from hahaxiang27/FlowHarness. It costs 19 tokens per session (4,889 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of checklist, MIT.

A requirements checklist generator that treats written requirements like code and checks their quality before implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Create a custom checklist from feature requirements, covering completeness, clarity, consistency, accessibility, visual details, and failure cases. It checks the specification itself, not the finished software.
Why use it?
It helps reveal missing details, unclear wording, inconsistent rules, and uncovered edge cases before developers build the feature.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Good fit Create a custom checklist from feature requirements, covering completeness, clarity, consistency, accessibility, visual details, and failure cases. It checks the specification itself, not the finished software.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hahaxiang27/FlowHarness

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit-checklist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit-checklist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hahaxiang27/flowharness/speckit.checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,889 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00019 $0.04889
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.02445
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00978
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00489

Measured 9d ago against content hash aae4d7dc7f0d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to checklist — 763 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

commands/speckit.checklist.md · 385 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 385 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"

CRITICAL CONCEPT: Checklists are UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.

NOT for verification/testing:

  • 鉂?NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
  • 鉂?NOT "Test error handling works"
  • 鉂?NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
  • 鉂?NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec

FOR requirements quality validation:

  • 鉁?"Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
  • 鉁?"Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
  • 鉁?"Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
  • 鉁?"Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
  • 鉁?"Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)

Metaphor: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Pre-Execution Checks

Check for extension hooks (before checklist generation):

  • Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_checklist key
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-). For example, speckit.git.commit 鈫?/speckit-git-commit.
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Execution Steps.
      
  • If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently

Read the full file on GitHub · 385 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 385 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A aae4d7dc7f0d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit-checklist is a command published in the GitHub repository hahaxiang27/FlowHarness (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 4,889 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to checklist, differing in 763 lines, and is treated as a copy.