Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hainrixz/agente-pagokitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hainrixz/agente-pagokit/coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hainrixz/agente-pagokit/coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hainrixz/agente-pagokit/coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/pagokit:coverage
Answers "what are my options in X?" with data rather than a general impression.
- Resolve the argument to an ISO-3166 alpha-2 code. Accept a country name in English or
Spanish. If the code is not in
regions.json, say so plainly — an absent country means PagoKit has no verified answer there, which is different from there being no answer. - Read
skills/payment-advisor/data/regions.jsonfor that code andproviders.index.jsonfor the providers it names. - If
unsupportedis set, report the reason and stop. Do not suggest a workaround for a sanctioned market.
Output
<Country> (<code>) — <currency>, <exponent> decimal places
Local providers: <name> [<level>] · <name> [<level>]
Cross-border MoR: <name> [<level>]
Dominant instant rail: <rail label>
Local rails available: <methods from the catalog for this region>
What you must know:
• <requires_local_acquirer, with the reason, if set>
• <e-invoicing mandate, if set — and that a merchant of record removes the obligation>
• <installments_expected, if set>
• <currency exponent, when it is not 2 — the amount must be sent at that exponent>
PagoKit can build: <the providers at build level>
PagoKit can only advise on: <the ones at advise level>
If primary_providers is empty, say exactly that: there is no local provider in the catalog
yet, the fallback is a cross-border merchant of record, and it costs more than a local option
would. Do not dress that up.
Anti-patterns
- Do not list a provider without its integration level.
- Do not omit the e-invoicing obligation. A working payment is not a compliant sale.
- Do not treat an empty
primary_providersas "use the fallback and move on" — the user should know they are paying a cross-border premium.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 48 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f5bc97732ca4
coverage is a command published in the GitHub repository Hainrixz/agente-pagokit (39 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 492 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other commands, from other repositories
close-review
Month-end close / GL compliance check — invokes accounting-reviewer to produce TM-accounting-{slug}.md with double-entry integrity, ASC 606 revenue-recognition, period-lock, and SOX ITGC gaps.
procurement-review
Procurement / source-to-pay compliance check — invokes procurement-reviewer to produce TM-procurement-{slug}.md with three-way match, segregation-of-duties, OFAC-screening, and SOX procurement-controls gaps.
tax-review
Tax-filing compliance check — invokes tax-reviewer to produce TM-tax-{slug}.md with MeF e-file schema, Form 8879, PTIN/Circular 230, and IRC §7216 consent gaps.
research
Professional equity research analysis with institutional-grade formatting.
coding-audit
Medical-coding / revenue-cycle compliance audit. Invokes rcm-reviewer to assess autonomous ICD-10-CM / CPT / HCPCS coding for False Claims Act exposure (upcoding/unbundling), NCCI edits + MUEs, medical necessity (LCD/NCD), modifier discipline, HIPAA minimum-necessary — and force a certified-coder (CPC/CCS) sign-off.
billing-rate
Gestiona tarifas y facturas de servicios legales. Subcomandos: set (definir tarifa), calculate (calcular honorarios), invoice (generar factura), report (análisis), list (listar tarifas).