Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/agentic-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00655 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit $ARGUMENTS for security vulnerabilities. Reports, never edits — it verifies every claim, then hands the findings to whoever asked.
Runs identically standalone or as stage 2 of /branch-review. The only
difference is where the report goes: to the orchestrator when called as a
stage, to you when you run it directly. Same checks, same verify pass, same
escalation. It does not spawn a worker of its own — run it inline; when
/branch-review calls it, it is already inside that command's worker.
Adapt scope to what the target actually is — a library, CLI, web app, and service won't all have every category. Skip what genuinely doesn't apply; never invent findings to fill a section.
The recurring six (check every project, where applicable)
These show up in nearly every quickly-built app regardless of stack:
- Secrets in the repo. Tokens / API keys /
.envfiles committed to tracked files or anywhere in git history. Verify.envis gitignored and only a value-less.env.exampleis tracked; scan history (git log -p,git grep) for leaked keys. Secrets must load from env / a secret store at runtime — never hardcoded, never logged. - Data-access authorization (tenant isolation). Every record read or written must be scoped to the requesting principal — via DB-level rules (RLS / row policies) and/or application-layer ownership checks. Flag any query that trusts a client-supplied id without an ownership or role gate, and any table/collection with a policy that's too broad or missing.
- Rate limiting. Every externally reachable endpoint and abuse-prone inbound path is bounded — including authenticated mutation/write routes, not just the obvious public GETs. Note any unbounded route.
- Error handling past the happy path. Third-party / IO / DB failures are caught; nothing fails silently; no internal detail (stack traces, queries, secrets) leaks to the client. Background/async work has its own catch.
- Authorization beyond authentication (IDOR / privilege). "Logged in" is not "allowed to do this". Confirm ownership AND role/permission checks on every state-changing or privileged action. Mentally swap an id in a request — does it return 403, or does it leak/modify another user's data?
- Inefficient data access (N+1 / unindexed). Queries inside loops, per-render repeated calls, missing indexes on filtered/joined columns. Correct but falls over under load — a real availability risk.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 103 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 8aed4fa927ab
security is a command published in the GitHub repository hamr0/agentic-toolkit (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
OPSX: Verify
Verify implementation matches change artifacts before archiving.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
OPSX: Continue
Continue working on a change - create the next artifact (Experimental).
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.