Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/shipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/agentic-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hamr0/agentic-toolkit/ship.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00809 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mechanical pre-deploy / pre-merge gate. Every item here is answerable by
running a command and reading its exit code — no code judgment. Code
judgment belongs to /branch-review (which runs /security in full as its
second stage); this gate does not duplicate it.
Detect the stack first (look for package.json,
pyproject.toml/setup.cfg, go.mod, Cargo.toml, Makefile) and run only
the checks that actually exist — never assume a script (lint, build,
migrate) is present.
Evidence rule
Report each item as pass / fail / N/A, and record the exact command and
its exit code. A check you did not run is a fail, never a pass. N/A
requires a stated reason ("no build script in package.json") — N/A must
never stand in for "didn't get to it."
Capture the exit code of the command itself, never of a pipeline. Run the
bare command, then read $? on the next line:
node "$f" > /tmp/out 2>&1; e=$?
$? after a pipe is the last element's status, so the common shape
out=$(cmd 2>&1 | tail -1); echo "exit=$?" reports tail's success — 0 —
for a suite that exited 2. Reproduced: a check printing "exit 2:
prerequisites missing" was recorded as a pass by exactly that loop. Nor does
${PIPESTATUS[0]} rescue it inside a command substitution; it is empty by
the time you read it. This is the rule the whole gate rests on, and the
piped form is the natural way to write a multi-suite loop, so it fails
silently and in the unsafe direction.
Checklist
- Tests pass — run the project's real test command (
npm test,pytest,go test ./...,cargo test,make test). - Lint / format clean — only if a linter or formatter is configured.
- Build succeeds — only if the project has a build step.
- No debug leftovers — stray
console.log/print/debugger/dbg!/ commented-out blocks / blockerTODOs in the changed files. - No hardcoded secrets — grep the diff for keys, tokens, credentials;
confirm
.envis gitignored and only a value-less.env.exampleis tracked. This is the one check/securityalso makes, kept deliberately: it is a grep with a binary answer, and a leaked key is the one failure worth catching twice. - Migrations ready — only if the project has a schema / migrations: they apply cleanly and are ordered.
- Docs & config in sync —
.env.example, README, and any PRD / context doc updated for new config or new usage. - Clean tree, correct branch, in sync with
origin— and never onmain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 60 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 77873a16d61d
ship is a command published in the GitHub repository hamr0/agentic-toolkit (22 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 809 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
diagnose_bk_failure
Fast automated diagnosis of Buildkite build failures using the specialized buildkite-error-detective agent.
security-test
Fast, continuous DevSecOps pipeline for Pull Requests and active branches. Runs SAST, SCA, and secrets detection to catch vulnerabilities before they merge.
release
You are a release agent for the Gigacode project (sandbox-agent). Your job is to cut a new release by running the release script, monitoring the GitHub Actions workflow, and fixing any failures until the release succeeds.
ci
Push branch and trigger CI workflow.
fix-ci
Start an iterative CI fix session — resolve the input (build / PR / branch / cwd), then run the fixing-ci skill loop until CI is green or you've hit the iteration cap.
tester-build
Cut a signed tester build via GitHub Actions and locate the installer to share with a remote tester.