security

security is a command for Claude Code from hamr0/liteagents. It costs 12 tokens per session (1,926 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command for auditing a target project for security vulnerabilities, adapting the checks to whether it is a library, command-line tool, web app, or service. It covers issues such as exposed secrets, missing access controls, and absent rate limits where relevant.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check for leaked credentials, unsafe data access, missing rate limits, and other applicable security problems in a codebase.
Why use it?
It gives a repeatable way to look for common security weaknesses without reporting categories that do not apply to the target.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to check for leaked credentials, unsafe data access, missing rate limits, and other applicable security problems in a codebase.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/hamr0/liteagents/security
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hamr0/liteagents

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hamr0/liteagents/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,926 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.01926
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00770
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00385
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00193

Measured 15d ago against content hash fcbc9ba7884a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/droid/commands/security.md · 116 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Audit $ARGUMENTS for security vulnerabilities. Reports, never edits — it verifies every claim, then hands the findings to whoever asked.

Runs identically standalone or as stage 2 of /branch-review. The only difference is where the report goes: to the orchestrator when called as a stage, to you when you run it directly. Same checks, same verify pass, same escalation. It does not spawn a worker of its own — run it inline; when /branch-review calls it, it is already inside that command's worker.

Adapt scope to what the target actually is — a library, CLI, web app, and service won't all have every category. Skip what genuinely doesn't apply; never invent findings to fill a section.

The recurring six (check every project, where applicable)

These show up in nearly every quickly-built app regardless of stack:

  1. Secrets in the repo. Tokens / API keys / .env files committed to tracked files or anywhere in git history. Verify .env is gitignored and only a value-less .env.example is tracked. Scan ALL history, every branch — a range or target never narrows this — with: git log --all -p | grep -nE '(sk-[A-Za-z0-9_-]{16,}|AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}|gh[pousr]_[A-Za-z0-9]{30,}|xox[abprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}|AIza[0-9A-Za-z_-]{35}|-----BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY)' plus any key shape specific to this project's providers. Report each hit as real or a known test fixture. Secrets must load from env / a secret store at runtime — never hardcoded, never logged.
  2. Data-access authorization (tenant isolation). Every record read or written must be scoped to the requesting principal — via DB-level rules (RLS / row policies) and/or application-layer ownership checks. Flag any query that trusts a client-supplied id without an ownership or role gate, and any table/collection with a policy that's too broad or missing.
  3. Rate limiting. Every externally reachable endpoint and abuse-prone inbound path is bounded — including authenticated mutation/write routes, not just the obvious public GETs. Note any unbounded route.
  4. Error handling past the happy path. Third-party / IO / DB failures are caught; nothing fails silently; no internal detail (stack traces, queries, secrets) leaks to the client. Background/async work has its own catch.
  5. Authorization beyond authentication (IDOR / privilege). "Logged in" is not "allowed to do this". Confirm ownership AND role/permission checks on every state-changing or privileged action. Mentally swap an id in a request — does it return 403, or does it leak/modify another user's data?
  6. Inefficient data access (N+1 / unindexed). Queries inside loops, per-render repeated calls, missing indexes on filtered/joined columns. Correct but falls over under load — a real availability risk.

Read the full file on GitHub · 116 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 15d ago Changed · +13 lines fcbc9ba7884a
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines eaa284ca9cd4
  3. 1mo ago Changed · -3 lines · -2 tokens per session 54dfcbe398b5
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +16 lines · +7 tokens per session 8aed4fa927ab
  5. 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 7e61c5cece49

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security is a command published in the GitHub repository hamr0/liteagents (25 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,926 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.