Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill/me-cfd-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill/me-cfd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill/me-cfd-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill/me-cfd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill/me-cfd-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
me-cfd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Thermal-Fluid CFD Review
Use mechanical-engineering-research to review CFD work before it is trusted as evidence in a paper, report, proposal, or design decision.
Workflow:
- Identify governing physics: laminar, transitional, turbulent, compressible, multiphase, conjugate, reacting, radiating, or non-Newtonian.
- Inspect geometry, boundary conditions, material properties, wall heat flux or temperature treatment, and inlet/outlet assumptions.
- Check turbulence or multiphase models against the operating regime.
- Check mesh independence, y+, wall treatment, residuals, conservation imbalance, and monitor convergence.
- Compare CFD outputs against analytical limits, empirical correlations, experiments, datasheets, or benchmark cases.
- Separate what the CFD shows from what it does not prove.
Expected output:
- CFD credibility memo
- missing setup details
- validation and sanity-check plan
- unsupported or overclaimed conclusions
- revised defensible claim wording
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 25 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 2d8e96e8427c
me-cfd-review is a command published in the GitHub repository hanhuark/mechanical-engineering-research-skill (16 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 231 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
research
Start or resume an academic research project — idea through literature, methodology, writing, feedback, and publishing.
openehr-explain
One-stop router that explains or looks up any openEHR thing — auto-detects an archetype, a template, an RM/AM/BASE type, an RM structural concept, an ADL idiom, an AQL query or keyword, or a terminology code (replaces /archetype-explain, /template-explain, /type-spec, /rm-structure, /adl-idiom, /terminology).
gpd:write-paper
Structure and write a physics paper from project research results or a bounded external-authoring intake.
gpd:derive-equation
Perform a rigorous physics derivation with systematic verification at each step.
gpd:limiting-cases
Systematically identify and verify all relevant limiting cases for a result or phase.
external-review
Run a single external code review via an external LLM API on the full branch diff vs main. Standalone usage — no aggregation with internal review.