Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Hassaan146/forge-mentor/plugin install forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hassaan146/forge-mentor/status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hassaan146/forge-mentor/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hassaan146/forge-mentor/status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hassaan146/forge-mentor/status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hassaan146/forge-mentor/status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00862 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00431 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Show where the work is, and carry on from it.
Start with catch_up. It returns two blocks: the story so far, and whatever comes next.
Paste them in that order and stop. That is the whole reply on the common path, which is
somebody reopening after a gap and needing to know where they were.
Unless there is no second block. An empty next_block does not mean there is nothing to do,
it means nothing is waiting on the user — the step is decided and the next move is Forge's. Do
not stop there. Carry straight on in the same turn: current_step, then plan_files, then
build it. This ended a real session on the line "No question is open; nothing is blocking you",
which reads as a finished report and is actually a loop that forgot to take its turn. Follow the
next field that catch_up returns; it says which of the two endings applies.
The summary is assembled from the records every time rather than kept in a log, so there is no second version of the history to drift from the first (decision 011: the repository is the memory). It carries the idea in the user's own words, how many questions are answered against the estimate, how many decisions are recorded, phases finished, steps built, which step is open now, and the last three decisions with what was chosen.
If it reports needs_repair, call check_history, show what is damaged, and offer
repair_history, which is the tool that fixes it: it quarantines the damaged records before
it writes anything, so nothing is destroyed and the original is still on disk afterwards. Say
that, then ask, then run it if they say yes. Telling somebody their notes are broken and
naming no repair is the shape of an error message, not of a product. Nothing else on this
screen is worth reading until the notes are sound.
If the user asks whether they ever asked for something — "did I say I wanted dark mode",
"what did I ask about the database" — call what_did_i_ask_for with their words. It searches
the records and returns what they asked, when, and what was decided. Answering from memory
here is guessing about the one thing this product exists to have written down.
Everything below is the longer report, for when the user asks for more than a glance.
Steps:
- Call
next_stepfor the stage, the subagent, the model, and whether the next step needs the user. - Call
current_statefor what is decided and what is open. - Call
usage_reportfor tokens used so far. If it reportsavailable: false, say usage is unavailable in one line and carry on — nothing else depends on it. - Call
check_historyto confirm the decision records are intact.
Then check the version — a status report from a plugin that is two weeks behind describes a project state that may already have moved:
python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/forge_update.py"
It prints nothing when the copy is current. Print what it returns, add nothing.
Then print, using the Forge visual identity:
- the banner, then the progress bar with the count of questions answered against the estimate (rule R4 — always show how many remain)
- the current stage in plain words, and what happens next
- the open question, if there is one, and that code is blocked until it is answered — put the
question itself through
render_action, because it is the one thing on this screen the user can do something about, and everything around it is a report - which model does the next step and why (rule R2 — name it: "Fable 5", not "the teaching model")
- usage, and any threshold warning
- anything the review still has open
Keep it short. This is a glance, not a report.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 69 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 0a022710762a
status is a command published in the GitHub repository Hassaan146/forge-mentor (22 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 862 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
amend-plan
Plan Amend - Discuss and apply amendments to a plan.json implementation plan.
security-audit
Comprehensive security audit of your project AND Claude Code configuration. Analyzes secrets exposure, injection surfaces, dependencies, hook security, and produces a scored security posture assessment.
worktree
Create a git worktree for isolated feature/fix work.
version
Display current guide and Claude Code versions.