Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hautc-it/cil/commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hautc-it/cilWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/commit
Generate and run a commit for staged changes.
Step 1 — Inspect
git diff --staged
git status
Check nothing sensitive is staged: .env, API keys, large binaries, generated files.
If anything suspicious: warn and stop.
Step 2 — Analyze
What changed? Identify:
- Type: feat | fix | refactor | docs | test | chore | perf
- Scope: affected module or area (optional)
- What it adds/fixes/removes — the WHY, not the WHAT
Step 3 — Draft message
Format:
<type>(<scope>): <short description under 72 chars>
<body — only if the why is non-obvious>
Examples:
feat(auth): add OAuth2 login with Google provider
fix(api): return 404 instead of 500 for missing users
refactor(db): extract query builder to reduce duplication
Step 4 — Commit
git commit -m "<message>"
If pre-commit hook fails: fix the issue, re-stage, create new commit (never --no-verify).
Report: "Committed: [message]"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 62 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A f062428875e1
commit is a command published in the GitHub repository hautc-it/cil (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 312 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
README
Git workflow and quality assurance commands for the claude-skills repository.
validate
Validate a finding — runs 7-Question Gate + 4-gate checklist. Kills weak findings before report writing. Prevents N/A submissions that hurt validity ratio. Usage: /validate.
convert-to-todowrite-tasklist-prompt
Purpose: Transform verbose, context-heavy slash commands into efficient TodoWrite tasklist-based methods with parallel subagent execution for 60-70% speed improvements.
security-audit
Perform a comprehensive security audit of the codebase to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practice violations.
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
session-end
I'll summarize this coding session and update the memory system with our accomplishments.