Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hazelnutparadise/insyra/continuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HazelnutParadise/insyraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hazelnutparadise/insyra/continue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hazelnutparadise/insyra/continue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hazelnutparadise/insyra/continue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01326 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00663 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
OPSX: Continue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- OPSX: Continue — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- OPSX: Continue — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- opsx-continue — 89% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context). Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name after /opsx:continue (e.g., /opsx:continue add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select which change to work on.Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from
schemafield if present, otherwise "spec-driven") - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModifiedfield)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
-
Check current status
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")isComplete: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are completeplanningHome,changeRoot,artifactPaths, andactionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
-
Act based on status:
If all artifacts are complete (
isComplete: true):- Congratulate the user
- Show final status including the schema used
- Suggest: "All artifacts created! You can now implement this change with
/opsx:applyor archive it with/opsx:archive." - STOP
If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with
status: "ready"):- Pick the FIRST artifact with
status: "ready"from the status output - Get its instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidanceresolvedOutputPath: Resolved path or pattern to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Create the artifact file:
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Use
templateas the structure - fill in its sections - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file - Write to the
resolvedOutputPathspecified in instructions. If it is a glob pattern, choose the concrete file path using the schema instruction and the change's context
- Show what was created and what's now unlocked
- STOP after creating ONE artifact
If no artifacts are ready (all blocked):
- This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
- Show status and suggest checking for issues
-
After creating an artifact, show progress
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifact was created
- Schema workflow being used
- Current progress (N/M complete)
- What artifacts are now unlocked
- Prompt: "Run
/opsx:continueto create the next artifact"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 119 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 1a2ffc6f77f8
OPSX: Continue is a command published in the GitHub repository HazelnutParadise/insyra (56 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,326 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Continue
Continue working on a change - create the next artifact (Experimental).
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: New
Start a new change using the experimental artifact workflow (OPSX).
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Continue
Continue working on a change - create the next artifact (Experimental).