tdd-feature

A command for implementing a feature with the full TDD loop: write a failing test, make it pass, then refactor the code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan and implement a new feature with configurable strictness, optional refactoring, selected files, and optional planning.
Why use it?
It organizes feature work around tests and can detect the project’s test command, test location, and chosen workflow strictness.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/hculap/better-code/tdd-feature
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hculap/better-code
Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,393 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00009 $0.01393
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00696
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00279
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00139

Measured yesterday against content hash 17a1ad600728, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

tdd-feature scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/tdd-dev/commands/tdd-feature.md · 176 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

TDD Feature Implementation

Implement a new feature using strict Test-Driven Development: $ARGUMENTS

Parse Arguments

Extract from arguments:

  • Feature description: The main description (required)
  • --strict / --standard / --relaxed: Override strictness mode (optional)
  • --no-refactor: Skip refactor phase after green (optional)
  • --file : Target specific file for tests/implementation (optional)
  • --plan: Force planning mode (require approval before test and implementation)
  • --skip-plan: Skip planning entirely, execute directly

Pre-Flight Checks

  1. Load settings: Read .claude/tdd-dev.local.md if exists
  2. Determine strictness: Use flag override > settings > default (strict)
  3. Detect test command: From settings or auto-detect from project files
  4. Identify test location: Find appropriate test file or create new one
  5. Reset TDD cycle state: Create/update .claude/.tdd-cycle-state to start fresh RED phase:
    {"phase": "red", "testFilesWritten": [], "testsRan": false, "testsFailed": false}
    
    This ensures hooks enforce "write test first" for this new feature.

Plan Mode Decision

Determine planning behavior based on flags:

  1. If --skip-plan flag: Skip all planning, proceed directly to TDD loop
  2. If --plan flag: Force planning before both RED and GREEN phases
  3. If neither flag (default): Ask user using AskUserQuestion:
    • "Would you like to review and approve the test plan before I write tests?"
    • Options: "Yes, show me the plan" / "No, proceed directly"
    • Store response for consistent behavior in GREEN phase

Test Planning Phase (unless --skip-plan)

If planning is enabled (via --plan flag or user choice):

  1. Enter plan mode: Use EnterPlanMode tool
  2. Analyze requirements:
    • What behaviors need testing for this feature?
    • What edge cases should be covered?
    • What test structure fits the project best?
  3. Write test plan to plan file including:
    • Test file location
    • Test cases to write (describe/it structure)
    • Expected assertions for each test
    • Mocking strategy if external dependencies involved
  4. Exit plan mode: Wait for user approval via ExitPlanMode
  5. Proceed to RED phase only after approval

Read the full file on GitHub · 176 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 176 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 17a1ad600728

Subscribe to this mod's changes

tdd-feature is a command published in the GitHub repository hculap/better-code (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 1,393 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.