agentmods.dev

code: Command for Claude Code

.specify/extensions/superspec/commands/review.md

review is a command for Claude Code from HelixDevelopment/code. It costs 0 tokens per session (388 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that reviews code against a feature specification and project rules. It checks requirements, edge cases, code quality, security, and tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a feature, specific files, or all current changes and report serious findings.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that an implementation is accepted even though it misses a requirement or contains an important defect.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

This is HelixDevelopment/code's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on code itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything code configures →

not rated 2repo 23d ago A scan 0 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ HelixDevelopment/code helixdevelopment-code.github.io
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to HelixDevelopment/code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HelixDevelopment/code/main/.specify/extensions/superspec/commands/review.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HelixDevelopment/code

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/helixdevelopment/code/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 388 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00388
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00155
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00078
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00039

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 96f891a89350, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.specify/extensions/superspec/commands/review.md · 51 lines

What it actually says

speckit.superspec.review

Run code review against spec requirements using review skills.

Usage

/speckit.superspec.review [scope]

Scope: Optional file paths, spec number, or "all changes". Defaults to the latest feature.

Process

  1. Read the spec and plan for the feature being reviewed
  2. Superpowers detection: Check for requesting-code-review skill
    • If found: Read the skill and follow its pre-evaluation checklist and review dispatch protocol
    • If not found: Use the built-in review protocol below
  3. Built-in review protocol:
    • Spec compliance: Verify each acceptance scenario from the spec is implemented
    • Edge case coverage: Verify brainstormed edge cases are handled
    • Constitution compliance: Check all governance principles are respected
    • Code quality: Check for bugs, security issues, error handling
    • Test coverage: Verify tests exist for critical paths
  4. Report findings with confidence scores (0-100, only report issues >= 80)
  5. Group findings by severity: Critical > Important > Suggestion

Output

Review findings reported to user. Optionally written to specs/NNN-feature-name/checklist-review.md.

Finding Format

Each finding includes:

  • Clear description with confidence score
  • File path and line reference
  • Specific recommendation or fix suggestion

Findings below 80 confidence are suppressed to reduce noise.

Superpowers Adaptation

When using the requesting-code-review skill, adapt its outputs:

  • Add superspec-specific review dimensions: spec compliance, constitution compliance, brainstorm coverage
  • Output location → report to user, optionally write to checklist file

See references/superpowers-bridge.md for full adaptation rules.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 96f891a89350

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository HelixDevelopment/code (2 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 388 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Code reviewDebuggingagentagentic-aiagentsaiai-agentscli
Related

review compared with commands from other repositories

review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
reviewHelixDevelopment/codeCommand223d agoMITA0Claude Code
proof-captureLykhoyda/rn-dev-agentCommand2012d agoMITA0Claude Code
debug-screenLykhoyda/rn-dev-agentCommand2012d agoMITA29Claude Code
refactor-cleanDekaPrayoga/AurixAgentCommand623mo agononeA13Claude Code
postspencermarx/open-code-reviewCommand3825d agoApache-2.0A11Claude Code
perf-profile.templateevan043/claude-cli-advanced-starter-packCommand613mo agoMITA0Claude Code
bug-checkyeaight7/agent-powerupsCommand81mo agoApache-2.0A25Claude Code