Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/fix-vuln)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/fix-vuln"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/fix-vuln/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/fix-vuln"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libresecops-claude-code/fix-vuln.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00875 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
fix-vuln scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/fix-vuln
Fix a specific vulnerability class in provided code, with root cause analysis, the corrected implementation, and verification guidance.
Trigger
Use when you have identified (or suspect) a specific vulnerability in code and need to fix it correctly. Appropriate for:
- Remediating findings from a security audit or penetration test
- Fixing a vulnerability reported through a bug bounty program
- Correcting a pattern flagged by a SAST tool
- Learning the proper fix for a specific vulnerability class
- Verifying that a proposed fix actually resolves the vulnerability
Input
- Code containing the vulnerability: The specific code to fix
- Vulnerability class: What type of vulnerability to fix. Examples:
- "SQL injection in the search function"
- "XSS in the comment display"
- "Path traversal in the file download endpoint"
- "Insecure deserialization in the session handler"
- "Hardcoded credentials in the database config"
- "Missing authorization check on the admin endpoint"
- "Weak password hashing with MD5"
- Additional context (optional): Framework, deployment environment, constraints on the fix
Process
-
Vulnerability confirmation -- Analyze the provided code to confirm the vulnerability exists and understand its exact nature. If the code is not actually vulnerable, explain why.
-
Root cause identification -- Determine the fundamental cause:
- Is it a missing control? (no authorization check)
- Is it a wrong API choice? (string concatenation instead of parameterized query)
- Is it a configuration issue? (security feature disabled)
- Is it a logic flaw? (checking condition incorrectly)
- Is it a design issue? (architecture that makes security hard)
-
Impact assessment -- Explain what an attacker can achieve by exploiting this vulnerability:
- Data theft, modification, or destruction
- Authentication bypass or privilege escalation
- Remote code execution
- Denial of service
- Information disclosure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago Changed · +5 lines · +21 tokens per session b14be71ad250
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a6d12d2e25e3
fix-vuln is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreSecOps-Claude-Code (4 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify
An independent recheck of a security assessment report that derives conclusions from its own evidence instead of accepting the original findings.
corporate-launcher
Build a secure, branded, organization-specific launcher around an AI coding CLI (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor, or Cline) so the user can.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.