Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.02030 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00812 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- git-workflow — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- git-workflow — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Complete Git Workflow with Multi-Agent Orchestration
Orchestrate a comprehensive git workflow from code review through PR creation, leveraging specialized agents for quality assurance, testing, and deployment readiness. This workflow implements modern git best practices including Conventional Commits, automated testing, and structured PR creation.
[Extended thinking: This workflow coordinates multiple specialized agents to ensure code quality before commits are made. The code-reviewer agent performs initial quality checks, test-automator ensures all tests pass, and deployment-engineer verifies production readiness. By orchestrating these agents sequentially with context passing, we prevent broken code from entering the repository while maintaining high velocity. The workflow supports both trunk-based and feature-branch strategies with configurable options for different team needs.]
Configuration
Target branch: $ARGUMENTS (defaults to 'main' if not specified)
Supported flags:
--skip-tests: Skip automated test execution (use with caution)--draft-pr: Create PR as draft for work-in-progress--no-push: Perform all checks but don't push to remote--squash: Squash commits before pushing--conventional: Enforce Conventional Commits format strictly--trunk-based: Use trunk-based development workflow--feature-branch: Use feature branch workflow (default)
Phase 1: Pre-Commit Review and Analysis
1. Code Quality Assessment
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="code-reviewer"
- Prompt: "Review all uncommitted changes for code quality issues. Check for: 1) Code style violations, 2) Security vulnerabilities, 3) Performance concerns, 4) Missing error handling, 5) Incomplete implementations. Generate a detailed report with severity levels (critical/high/medium/low) and provide specific line-by-line feedback. Output format: JSON with {issues: [], summary: {critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0}, recommendations: []}"
- Expected output: Structured code review report for next phase
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed · +5 lines · +14 tokens per session c9e1fcd1b4a0
- 1mo ago First seen · 118 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dcaa5f768a93
git-workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (115 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 2,030 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
plan-execute
Execute a validated plan: worktree isolation, TDD scaffolding, level-based parallel agents, quality gate with smoke test, PR creation and merge. Handles everything through to merged PR.
work-flow-feature
Complete workflow for developing a new feature, from exploration to merge.
ccc-verify
Verify the current codebase in a fixed order (build, types, lint, tests with coverage, secrets, debug logs, git status) and return a PASS/FAIL report with a ready-for-PR verdict. Use before committing, before opening a PR, or when asked to check that everything still works.
remove-deadcode
Remove unused code from this project with ultrawork mode, LSP-verified safety, atomic commits.
quick-commit
A quick Git command for committing and pushing a small code change. Git is the tool that records code versions and sends them to a shared repository.
implement
Execute all implementation tasks from tasks.md with test-driven development, parallel batching, and atomic commits.