Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/legacy-modernize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/legacy-modernize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/legacy-modernize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/legacy-modernize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/legacy-modernize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01884 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00754 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
legacy-modernize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- legacy-modernize — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- legacy-modernize — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legacy Code Modernization Workflow
Orchestrate a comprehensive legacy system modernization using the strangler fig pattern, enabling gradual replacement of outdated components while maintaining continuous business operations through expert agent coordination.
[Extended thinking: The strangler fig pattern, named after the tropical fig tree that gradually envelops and replaces its host, represents the gold standard for risk-managed legacy modernization. This workflow implements a systematic approach where new functionality gradually replaces legacy components, allowing both systems to coexist during transition. By orchestrating specialized agents for assessment, testing, security, and implementation, we ensure each migration phase is validated before proceeding, minimizing disruption while maximizing modernization velocity.]
Phase 1: Legacy Assessment and Risk Analysis
1. Comprehensive Legacy System Analysis
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="legacy-modernizer"
- Prompt: "Analyze the legacy codebase at $ARGUMENTS. Document technical debt inventory including: outdated dependencies, deprecated APIs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and architectural anti-patterns. Generate a modernization readiness report with component complexity scores (1-10), dependency mapping, and database coupling analysis. Identify quick wins vs complex refactoring targets."
- Expected output: Detailed assessment report with risk matrix and modernization priorities
2. Dependency and Integration Mapping
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="architect-review"
- Prompt: "Based on the legacy assessment report, create a comprehensive dependency graph showing: internal module dependencies, external service integrations, shared database schemas, and cross-system data flows. Identify integration points that will require facade patterns or adapter layers during migration. Highlight circular dependencies and tight coupling that need resolution."
- Context from previous: Legacy assessment report, component complexity scores
- Expected output: Visual dependency map and integration point catalog
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +5 lines · +14 tokens per session e31b4966bd72
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 072444ef599d
legacy-modernize is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (115 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
status
Display project status, active tracks, and next actions.
update-counts
Explicitly refresh public toolkit and committed marketplace source snapshots and numeric documentation.
scout-meta-review
Run an interactive Scout meta-review — a system-level audit that sits above the individual session types. Checks whether sessions are running, mistake audit is trending well, proposals are flowing, KB files are healthy, and data-source coverage is consistent across session types. Runs in the current conversation.
triage
Process the user-feedback queue — triage new reports, keep the status mirror honest, and (at release time only) send the shipped emails.
audit
Audit closed tickets for regressions against today's code (unchanged, evolved, implemented wrong, not implemented), plus duplicate and groupable open ones.
plan-start
5-phase planning command: PRD analysis, design review, technical decisions, dynamic research team, metrics. Produces a complete implementation plan + ADRs before any code is written.