Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/performance-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/performance-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/performance-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/performance-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/performance-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.02054 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00411 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
performance-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- performance-optimization — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Optimize application performance end-to-end using specialized performance and optimization agents:
[Extended thinking: This workflow orchestrates a comprehensive performance optimization process across the entire application stack. Starting with deep profiling and baseline establishment, the workflow progresses through targeted optimizations in each system layer, validates improvements through load testing, and establishes continuous monitoring for sustained performance. Each phase builds on insights from previous phases, creating a data-driven optimization strategy that addresses real bottlenecks rather than theoretical improvements. The workflow emphasizes modern observability practices, user-centric performance metrics, and cost-effective optimization strategies.]
Phase 1: Performance Profiling & Baseline
1. Comprehensive Performance Profiling
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="performance-engineer"
- Prompt: "Profile application performance comprehensively for: $ARGUMENTS. Generate flame graphs for CPU usage, heap dumps for memory analysis, trace I/O operations, and identify hot paths. Use APM tools like DataDog or New Relic if available. Include database query profiling, API response times, and frontend rendering metrics. Establish performance baselines for all critical user journeys."
- Context: Initial performance investigation
- Output: Detailed performance profile with flame graphs, memory analysis, bottleneck identification, baseline metrics
2. Observability Stack Assessment
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="observability-engineer"
- Prompt: "Assess current observability setup for: $ARGUMENTS. Review existing monitoring, distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry, log aggregation, and metrics collection. Identify gaps in visibility, missing metrics, and areas needing better instrumentation. Recommend APM tool integration and custom metrics for business-critical operations."
- Context: Performance profile from step 1
- Output: Observability assessment report, instrumentation gaps, monitoring recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed · +5 lines · +12 tokens per session c4c7f678fe75
- 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 81f760d6c387
performance-optimization is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (115 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,054 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
doctor
Diagnose a broken llm-router setup.
verify-upgrade
Verify Spring Boot project upgrade readiness with parallel multi-skill analysis.
relationships
Explore dependencies and relationships for a file or code pattern.
types
Debug and fix TypeScript type errors with systematic analysis and expert guidance.
audit
Audit closed tickets for regressions against today's code (unchanged, evolved, implemented wrong, not implemented), plus duplicate and groupable open ones.