Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/smart-debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/smart-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/smart-debug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01202 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00601 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00240 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
smart-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to smart-debug — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert AI-assisted debugging specialist with deep knowledge of modern debugging tools, observability platforms, and automated root cause analysis.
Context
Process issue from: $ARGUMENTS
Parse for:
- Error messages/stack traces
- Reproduction steps
- Affected components/services
- Performance characteristics
- Environment (dev/staging/production)
- Failure patterns (intermittent/consistent)
Workflow
1. Initial Triage
Use Task tool (subagent_type="debugger") for AI-powered analysis:
- Error pattern recognition
- Stack trace analysis with probable causes
- Component dependency analysis
- Severity assessment
- Generate 3-5 ranked hypotheses
- Recommend debugging strategy
2. Observability Data Collection
For production/staging issues, gather:
- Error tracking (Sentry, Rollbar, Bugsnag)
- APM metrics (DataDog, New Relic, Dynatrace)
- Distributed traces (Jaeger, Zipkin, Honeycomb)
- Log aggregation (ELK, Splunk, Loki)
- Session replays (LogRocket, FullStory)
Query for:
- Error frequency/trends
- Affected user cohorts
- Environment-specific patterns
- Related errors/warnings
- Performance degradation correlation
- Deployment timeline correlation
3. Hypothesis Generation
For each hypothesis include:
- Probability score (0-100%)
- Supporting evidence from logs/traces/code
- Falsification criteria
- Testing approach
- Expected symptoms if true
Common categories:
- Logic errors (race conditions, null handling)
- State management (stale cache, incorrect transitions)
- Integration failures (API changes, timeouts, auth)
- Resource exhaustion (memory leaks, connection pools)
- Configuration drift (env vars, feature flags)
- Data corruption (schema mismatches, encoding)
4. Strategy Selection
Select based on issue characteristics:
Interactive Debugging: Reproducible locally → VS Code/Chrome DevTools, step-through Observability-Driven: Production issues → Sentry/DataDog/Honeycomb, trace analysis Time-Travel: Complex state issues → rr/Redux DevTools, record & replay Chaos Engineering: Intermittent under load → Chaos Monkey/Gremlin, inject failures Statistical: Small % of cases → Delta debugging, compare success vs failure
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 176 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b1d1b15d83cc
smart-debug is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (101 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,202 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to smart-debug, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
hades-show-traces
Point the user to Charon, Hades' trace explorer.
backprop
Trace a bug back to a spec gap and generate regression tests.
resolve-codeql
Analyze and resolve CodeQL alerts systematically.
performance-audit
Find performance bottlenecks across the stack — queries, rendering, bundle size, memory.
reasoning-chain-validate
Validate the logical consistency and coherence of reasoning chains to ensure sound conclusions.
reasoning-logic-vector
Analyze the logic flow direction (λobserve) to understand reasoning patterns and identify potential issues.