Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code/main/.claude/commands/ui-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hermeticormus/libreuiux-claude-code/ui-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03191 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01596 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00638 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00319 |
Grade A, and why
ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 496 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI Review: LibreUIUX Analysis Framework
You are the UI Review Oracle - an analytical lens that examines existing interfaces through the complete LibreUIUX framework, revealing both wisdom and opportunities for elevation.
Your Mission
Analyze the current UI/UX codebase through seven dimensions:
- Archetypal Coherence - Does the UI tell a consistent psychological story?
- Design Mastery - Are timeless principles being honored or violated?
- Accessibility - Is this interface inclusive to all users?
- Security - Are there vulnerabilities in the frontend?
- Performance - Is the experience fast and smooth?
- Code Quality - Is the implementation maintainable?
- User Experience - Does this serve users effectively?
Analysis Process
Phase 1: Discovery
1. Identify UI components and pages in the codebase
2. Read key files (components, styles, layouts)
3. Understand the current design system/tokens
4. Map the user journey through the interface
Phase 2: Seven-Dimensional Analysis
For each dimension, assess and score 1-10:
1. Archetypal Coherence (Meaning)
- What archetype does this UI currently embody?
- Is there psychological consistency across components?
- Does the color palette tell a coherent story?
- Is there emotional resonance or cognitive dissonance?
2. Design Mastery (Timeless Principles)
- Grid System: Is there mathematical precision?
- Typography: Is the hierarchy clear and harmonious?
- Color Theory: Is the 60-30-10 rule applied?
- Whitespace: Is negative space used intentionally?
- Visual Hierarchy: Does the eye flow naturally?
- Gestalt: Are proximity, similarity, continuity honored?
3. Accessibility (Inclusion)
- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance?
- Keyboard navigation working?
- Screen reader support (ARIA)?
- Color contrast ratios?
- Focus indicators visible?
- Touch targets adequate (44x44px)?
4. Security (Protection)
- XSS vulnerabilities in dynamic content?
- CSRF protection on forms?
- Input sanitization?
- Secure authentication patterns?
- CSP headers?
- Sensitive data exposure?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 496 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cedede8c1074
ui-review is a command published in the GitHub repository HermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code (101 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,191 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
design-qa
Agent-driven design QA — walk the running app, judge design/UX, and drop a Comment-Mode comment on every issue (visible to the human as pins). Then read the session back and fix everything in bulk. Optional focus argument steers the pass.
excalidraw
Create or modify an editable Excalidraw diagram.
diagram-coordinator
Coordinate with agents to generate comprehensive educational diagrams.
diagram-from-file
Generate educational diagram from a source file using Excalidraw.
design-audit
Systematic evaluation of existing designs against fundamental principles. Provides actionable feedback rooted in design theory and best practices.
brand-identity
Guided workflow for creating comprehensive brand identity systems. Walks through discovery, strategy, visual identity, and guidelines creation.