Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/hi0001234d/coding-agent-mcp-tools/securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hi0001234d/coding-agent-mcp-toolsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00427 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00214 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch:security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
EXECUTE IMMEDIATELY — do not deliberate, do not ask clarifying questions before reading the protocol.
Argument Parsing (do this FIRST)
Extract these from $ARGUMENTS — the user may provide extensive context alongside flags. Ignore prose and extract ONLY flags/config:
--diff— only audit files changed since last audit--fix— auto-fix confirmed Critical/High findings--fail-on <severity>— exit non-zero for CI/CD gating (critical/high/medium)--scope <glob>orScope:— file globs to audit--depth <level>orDepth:— shallow (5 iterations), standard (15), deep (30+)Focus:— specific area to focus on (e.g., "authentication and authorization")Iterations:or--iterations N— integer for bounded mode (CRITICAL: run exactly N iterations then stop)
If Iterations: N or --iterations N is found, set max_iterations = N. Track current_iteration starting at 0. After iteration N, print final summary and STOP.
All remaining text in $ARGUMENTS is additional context — use it to understand scope but do not treat it as flags.
Execution
- Read the security workflow:
.claude/skills/autoresearch/references/security-workflow.md - If scope is missing — use
AskUserQuestionwith batched questions per security-workflow.md - Execute the 7-step security audit
- If bounded: after each iteration, check
current_iteration < max_iterations. If not, STOP and print summary.
Stream all output live — never run in background.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 33 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 531d738d3551
autoresearch:security is a command published in the GitHub repository hi0001234d/coding-agent-mcp-tools (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 427 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.