Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HigorAlves/orcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/higoralves/orc/jira-breakdown)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/higoralves/orc/jira-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/higoralves/orc/jira-breakdown/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/higoralves/orc/jira-breakdown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/higoralves/orc/jira-breakdown.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.02241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
jira-breakdown scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/orc:jira-breakdown
A feature is coming and the team needs to swarm it. This command builds the Jira structure that makes that possible — per the orc:jira-hierarchy contract (invoke it first; it defines the levels, the micro-PRD sections, the mandatory child template, and the atomization rules). orc-jira-architect drafts the hierarchy; nothing is created until you approve the preview.
Arguments
- Free-form input — a feature brief, a
docs/prds/NNNN-*.mdpath, or a plan file. With--epic, input is optional (the epic's own description is the material). --epic <KEY>— attach children to this existing Epic instead of drafting a new one.--project <KEY>— Jira project. Resolution order: this flag →docs/agents/issue-tracker.md(written by/orc:setup) → the bound session ticket's project → ask.--team-size <n>— how many developers will work in parallel (drives atomization aggressiveness; default 3).--dry-run— stop after the preview; create nothing.
Workflow
Phase 0 — Detect + backend preflight
!orc-workspace-detect --banner
Context is injected above (ORC_* vars are exported — do not re-run detection).
Pick the Jira backend:
- Jira MCP tools present in the session (tool names matching
mcp__*jira*/mcp__*atlassian*with work-item write capability) → prefer them. - Else acli: invoke
orc:jira-cli, thenacli jira auth status. Non-zero → surface the auth-login hint and stop. - Neither → stop: point at
orc install/aclisetup and/orc:setupfor tracker config. Never fake a creation.
Phase 1 — Resolve project + parent Epic
- Resolve the project key per the order above. Validate
^[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*$. - Resolve the Epic:
--epic <KEY>→ fetch it (acli jira workitem view <KEY> --jsonor MCP equivalent). It must exist and be active (status not Done/Closed/Resolved). Inactive or missing → surface and stop; children never attach to a dead Epic.- No
--epic→ search for candidates: JQLproject = <KEY> AND issuetype = Epic AND statusCategory != Donefiltered by input keywords. Then gate:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed · +1 lines · -28 tokens per session b1789c43a925
- 24d ago Changed 4407be4a47f4
- 2mo ago First seen · 148 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A c57421d068e1
jira-breakdown is a command published in the GitHub repository HigorAlves/orc (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
scout-meta-review
Run an interactive Scout meta-review — a system-level audit that sits above the individual session types. Checks whether sessions are running, mistake audit is trending well, proposals are flowing, KB files are healthy, and data-source coverage is consistent across session types. Runs in the current conversation.
scout-work
Interactive work session — walks through today's actionable items one at a time, presents a recommended action with draft content, and executes each one only with explicit approval. Runs in the current conversation (not as a background session).
ccc-makeover
Score project health with X-Ray, apply the top recommendations in impact order with your OK for each, and show the before and after score. Use when you want the highest-impact project health fixes applied and measured.
execute
Execute the next available tracked task with TDD, pre-commit validation, PR creation, AI code review, and issue tracker bridge sync.
dashboard
Compact visual progress dashboard with progress bar, task table, dependency graph, and active/blocked/next status.
sync
Reconcile coco tracker state with the configured issue tracker. Syncs task statuses and reports mismatches.