Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Himanshu507/cgconeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/himanshu507/cgcone/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/himanshu507/cgcone/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/himanshu507/cgcone/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/himanshu507/cgcone/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/himanshu507/cgcone/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00072 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review code for correctness, maintainability, performance, security, and style. Provide specific, actionable feedback with examples and suggested improvements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A f4da0f91f715
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Himanshu507/cgcone (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 72 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-pr
Comprehensive PR review using specialized agents.
code-review
Code review a pull request.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
anchors
List what each requirement tag anchors to (read-only).
vd-arch-review
Audita arquitetura de código em 3 níveis (macro/meso/micro). Detecta separação de camadas, anti-patterns, vazamento de abstração, dependências externas vs código customizado, acoplamento. User-invoked, sob demanda, para devs (não leigo). Use quando o usuário pede "auditoria arquitetural", "code review arquitetural"…
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.