analyze-deps

analyze-deps is a command for Claude Code from HKTITAN/cursor-best-practices. It costs 0 tokens per session (446 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command procedure for examining a project's software dependencies, including packages used directly by the project and packages they bring in.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect dependency trees, verify unused packages, find multiple package versions, review bundle-size impact, and suggest cleanup.
Why use it?
It helps find packages that are unused, duplicated, conflicting, or making a front-end bundle unnecessarily large.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md). Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to inspect dependency trees, verify unused packages, find multiple package versions, review bundle-size impact, and suggest cleanup.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HKTITAN/cursor-best-practices

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-deps

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyze-deps

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hktitan/cursor-best-practices/analyze-deps.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 446 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00446
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00223
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00089
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00045

Measured 8d ago against content hash 5848f559f808, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-deps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cursor-best-practices/assets/templates/commands/analyze-deps.md · 47 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analyze the project's dependency tree, identify unused or duplicate dependencies, and suggest optimizations.

Steps

  1. Analyze dependency tree

    • Use appropriate tools (e.g. npm ls, depcheck, pipdeptree, cargo tree, go mod graph).
    • Build dependency graph showing all direct and transitive dependencies.
  2. Identify unused dependencies

    • Check for dependencies listed in package files but not imported/used in code.
    • Use tools like depcheck (npm), pip-autoremove (Python), or manual analysis.
    • Verify false positives (some deps are used at build time or in configs).
  3. Find duplicate dependencies

    • Identify multiple versions of the same package.
    • Check for conflicting versions that could cause issues.
    • Look for packages that provide similar functionality.
  4. Check bundle size impact (if applicable)

    • For frontend projects, analyze bundle size contribution of each dependency.
    • Identify large dependencies that could be replaced or tree-shaken.
    • Check for duplicate code across dependencies.
  5. Suggest optimizations

    • For each issue, provide:
      • Dependency name and version(s)
      • Issue type (unused, duplicate, large, etc.)
      • Impact (bundle size, security, maintenance)
      • Suggested action (remove, update, replace, consolidate)
    • Prioritize by impact:
      • High — Large unused deps, security vulnerabilities, major duplicates
      • Medium — Small unused deps, minor duplicates
      • Low — Optimization opportunities
  6. Report

    • Summary of findings (unused, duplicates, large deps)
    • List of suggested removals/updates
    • Estimated impact (bundle size reduction, security improvements)
    • Warnings about potentially risky removals

Rules

  • Apply project rules from .cursor/rules or AGENTS.md when relevant.
  • Be cautious with removals; verify dependencies aren't used indirectly or at build time.
  • Consider security implications of outdated dependencies.
  • For removals, suggest testing thoroughly after changes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 47 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 47 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5848f559f808

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-deps is a command published in the GitHub repository HKTITAN/cursor-best-practices (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 446 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.