Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hluaguo/learn-faster-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00514 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Context
- Learning directory: !
ls -d .learning 2>/dev/null - Current topic: !
ls .learning/ 2>/dev/null
Note: If .learning/ doesn't exist, inform user to run /learn [topic]. Check topic folders (ignore scripts/).
Your Task
Conduct spaced repetition reviews to combat forgetting and reinforce learning.
If no .learning/:
- Inform: "No learning in progress. Use
/learn [topic]to start!"
If reviews due:
For each concept in review list:
- Present: "Let's review: [Concept Name]"
- Prompt teaching (rotate):
- "Explain [concept] in your own words"
- "How would you teach [concept] to a beginner?"
- "What's the key idea behind [concept]?"
- Listen to user's explanation
- Evaluate:
- Clear & accurate → Praise, mark reviewed
- Partial → Ask clarifying questions, guide to fill gaps
- Incorrect → Gently correct, provide hints
- Mark reviewed:
python3 .learning/scripts/review_scheduler.py review <topic-slug> "[Concept]"
After all reviews:
- Celebrate: "Great job! Reviewed N concepts! 🎉"
- Show next review date
- Use
AskUserQuestionfor next action:
{
"question": "What would you like to do next?",
"header": "Next",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{
"label": "Learn new",
"description": "Continue with next syllabus item"
},
{
"label": "Practice",
"description": "Work on hands-on exercises"
},
{
"label": "Take break",
"description": "Come back later"
}
]
}
If no reviews due:
- Inform: "No reviews due today! Next: [date]"
- Suggest continuing with new material
Handling forgotten concepts:
- Don't give answer immediately
- Provide hints: "It's related to [context]..."
- If still stuck: Review briefly, reschedule for tomorrow
- Reschedule:
python3 .learning/scripts/review_scheduler.py add <topic-slug> "[Concept]"
Key principle: Active recall (user reconstructs from memory), not passive recognition
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 77 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 640b86a22926
review is a command published in the GitHub repository hluaguo/learn-faster-kit (371 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 514 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
learn
Start learning a new topic — asks clarifying questions, researches resources, and creates a structured learning plan.
quiz
Quiz yourself on a topic from your learning plan with adaptive difficulty and mixed question formats.
resources
Find curated learning resources — books, courses, tutorials, and docs for any topic.
review
View your learning progress — quiz scores, weak areas, and what to study next.
explain
Explain code or concepts clearly with practical examples and analogies.
explain
Explain complex concepts in simple terms with examples and analogies.