Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hluaguo/learn-faster-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/hluaguo/learn-faster-kit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00514 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Context
- Learning directory: !
ls -d .learning 2>/dev/null - Current topic: !
ls .learning/ 2>/dev/null
Note: If .learning/ doesn't exist, inform user to run /learn [topic]. Check topic folders (ignore scripts/).
Your Task
Conduct spaced repetition reviews to combat forgetting and reinforce learning.
If no .learning/:
- Inform: "No learning in progress. Use
/learn [topic]to start!"
If reviews due:
For each concept in review list:
- Present: "Let's review: [Concept Name]"
- Prompt teaching (rotate):
- "Explain [concept] in your own words"
- "How would you teach [concept] to a beginner?"
- "What's the key idea behind [concept]?"
- Listen to user's explanation
- Evaluate:
- Clear & accurate → Praise, mark reviewed
- Partial → Ask clarifying questions, guide to fill gaps
- Incorrect → Gently correct, provide hints
- Mark reviewed:
python3 .learning/scripts/review_scheduler.py review <topic-slug> "[Concept]"
After all reviews:
- Celebrate: "Great job! Reviewed N concepts! 🎉"
- Show next review date
- Use
AskUserQuestionfor next action:
{
"question": "What would you like to do next?",
"header": "Next",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{
"label": "Learn new",
"description": "Continue with next syllabus item"
},
{
"label": "Practice",
"description": "Work on hands-on exercises"
},
{
"label": "Take break",
"description": "Come back later"
}
]
}
If no reviews due:
- Inform: "No reviews due today! Next: [date]"
- Suggest continuing with new material
Handling forgotten concepts:
- Don't give answer immediately
- Provide hints: "It's related to [context]..."
- If still stuck: Review briefly, reschedule for tomorrow
- Reschedule:
python3 .learning/scripts/review_scheduler.py add <topic-slug> "[Concept]"
Key principle: Active recall (user reconstructs from memory), not passive recognition
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 640b86a22926
review is a command published in the GitHub repository hluaguo/learn-faster-kit (393 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 514 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
explain
Explain complex concepts in simple terms with examples and analogies.
explain
Explain code or concepts clearly with practical examples and analogies.
learn
Start learning a new topic — asks clarifying questions, researches resources, and creates a structured learning plan.
quiz
Quiz yourself on a topic from your learning plan with adaptive difficulty and mixed question formats.
resources
Find curated learning resources — books, courses, tutorials, and docs for any topic.
review
View your learning progress — quiz scores, weak areas, and what to study next.